Evaluation and comparison of eight popular Lidar and Visual SLAM algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we evaluate eight popular and open-source 3D Lidar and visual SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) algorithms, namely LOAM, Lego LOAM, LIO SAM, HDL Graph, ORB SLAM3, Basalt VIO, and SVO2. We have devised experiments both indoor and outdoor to investigate the effect of the following items: i) effect of mounting positions of the sensors, ii) effect of terrain type and vibration, iii) effect of motion (variation in linear and angular speed). We compare their performance in terms of relative and absolute pose error. We also provide comparison on their required computational resources. We thoroughly analyse and discuss the results and identify the best performing system for the environment cases with our multi-camera and multi-Lidar indoor and outdoor datasets. We hope our findings help one to choose a sensor and the corresponding SLAM algorithm combination suiting their needs, based on their target environment.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2022.
Builds on
7 of 24 references.
References · 7
- 2020ORB-SLAM3: An Accurate Open-Source Library for Visual, Visual-Inertial and Multi-Map SLAMcited by 878
- 2016Past, Present, and Future of Simultaneous Localization And Mapping: Towards the Robust-Perception Agecited by 411
- 2020LIO-SAM: Tightly-coupled Lidar Inertial Odometry via Smoothing and Mappingcited by 188
- 2019Kimera: an Open-Source Library for Real-Time Metric-Semantic Localization and Mappingcited by 184
- 2018The TUM VI Benchmark for Evaluating Visual-Inertial Odometrycited by 99
- 2019Visual-Inertial Mapping with Non-Linear Factor Recoverycited by 50
- 2020Targetless Calibration of LiDAR-IMU System Based on Continuous-time Batch Estimationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.