mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Information Gain Sampling for Active Learning in Medical Image Classification

arXiv 2208.00974 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2022cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large, annotated datasets are not widely available in medical image analysis due to the prohibitive time, costs, and challenges associated with labelling large datasets. Unlabelled datasets are easier to obtain, and in many contexts, it would be feasible for an expert to provide labels for a small subset of images. This work presents an information-theoretic active learning framework that guides the optimal selection of images from the unlabelled pool to be labeled based on maximizing the expected information gain (EIG) on an evaluation dataset. Experiments are performed on two different medical image classification datasets: multi-class diabetic retinopathy disease scale classification and multi-class skin lesion classification. Results indicate that by adapting EIG to account for class-imbalances, our proposed Adapted Expected Information Gain (AEIG) outperforms several popular baselines including the diversity based CoreSet and uncertainty based maximum entropy sampling. Specifically, AEIG achieves ~95% of overall performance with only 19% of the training data, while other active learning approaches require around 25%. We show that, by careful design choices, our model can be integrated into existing deep learning classifiers.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2022.

Builds on

20 of 35 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
  4. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  5. 2019Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 657
  6. 2019Learning Loss for Active Learningcited by 335
  7. 2019Variational Adversarial Active Learningcited by 284
  8. 2016What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?cited by 192
  9. 2015Weakly- and Semi-Supervised Learning of a DCNN for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 189
  10. 2018Not-so-supervised: a survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysiscited by 178
  11. 2019A Survey on Active Learning and Human-in-the-Loop Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 150
  12. 2017Suggestive Annotation: A Deep Active Learning Framework for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 145
8 more
  1. 2018Synthetic Data Augmentation using GAN for Improved Liver Lesion Classificationcited by 136
  2. 2015Constrained Convolutional Neural Networks for Weakly Supervised Segmentationcited by 100
  3. 2019Deep Active Learning: Unified and Principled Method for Query and Trainingcited by 92
  4. 2018Constrained-CNN losses for weakly supervised segmentationcited by 62
  5. 2020Posterior Re-calibration for Imbalanced Datasetscited by 53
  6. 2016How useful is photo-realistic rendering for visual learning?cited by 22
  7. 2019An Active Learning Approach for Reducing Annotation Cost in Skin Lesion Analysiscited by 11
  8. 2020Confident Coreset for Active Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.