mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Separable Power of Classical and Quantum Learning Protocols Through the Lens of No-Free-Lunch Theorem

arXiv 2405.07226 ↗First posted 12 May 2024quant-ph cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The No-Free-Lunch (NFL) theorem, which quantifies problem- and data-independent generalization errors regardless of the optimization process, provides a foundational framework for comprehending diverse learning protocols' potential. Despite its significance, the establishment of the NFL theorem for quantum machine learning models remains largely unexplored, thereby overlooking broader insights into the fundamental relationship between quantum and classical learning protocols. To address this gap, we categorize a diverse array of quantum learning algorithms into three learning protocols designed for learning quantum dynamics under a specified observable and establish their NFL theorem. The exploited protocols, namely Classical Learning Protocols (CLC-LPs), Restricted Quantum Learning Protocols (ReQu-LPs), and Quantum Learning Protocols (Qu-LPs), offer varying levels of access to quantum resources. Our derived NFL theorems demonstrate quadratic reductions in sample complexity across CLC-LPs, ReQu-LPs, and Qu-LPs, contingent upon the orthogonality of quantum states and the diagonality of observables. We attribute this performance discrepancy to the unique capacity of quantum-related learning protocols to indirectly utilize information concerning the global phases of non-orthogonal quantum states, a distinctive physical feature inherent in quantum mechanics. Our findings not only deepen our understanding of quantum learning protocols' capabilities but also provide practical insights for the development of advanced quantum learning algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2024.

Builds on

46 of 105 references.

References · 46

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  5. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  7. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  8. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,420
  9. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
  10. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 919
  11. 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 770
  12. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 692
34 more
  1. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 665
  2. 2017Generative Adversarial Networks: An Overviewcited by 590
  3. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 522
  5. 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 338
  6. 2019Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning modelscited by 332
  7. 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 271
  8. 2020Transfer Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 265
  9. 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 233
  10. 2020Demystifying Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning: Invariances, Augmentations and Dataset Biasescited by 143
  11. 2021Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learningcited by 96
  12. 2017Quantum machine learning: a classical perspectivecited by 95
  13. 2021Equivariant Contrastive Learningcited by 66
  14. 2021Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memorycited by 52
  15. 2021Towards understanding the power of quantum kernels in the NISQ eracited by 43
  16. 2022Recent Advances for Quantum Neural Networks in Generative Learningcited by 39
  17. 2021Recent advances for quantum classifierscited by 35
  18. 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum statescited by 32
  19. 2021Scaling Laws for Deep Learningcited by 26
  20. 2020Classification with Quantum Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 23
  21. 2022Analytic theory for the dynamics of wide quantum neural networkscited by 21
  22. 2022Symmetric Pruning in Quantum Neural Networkscited by 21
  23. 2022Augmentation-Free Graph Contrastive Learning of Invariant-Discriminative Representationscited by 21
  24. 2021The dilemma of quantum neural networkscited by 20
  25. 2022Problem-Dependent Power of Quantum Neural Networks on Multi-Class Classificationcited by 20
  26. 2024Learning shallow quantum circuitscited by 20
  27. 2023Learning quantum states and unitaries of bounded gate complexitycited by 15
  28. 2023The power and limitations of learning quantum dynamics incoherentlycited by 12
  29. 2023Statistical Complexity of Quantum Learningcited by 11
  30. 2016A Practical Quantum Instruction Set Architecturecited by 9
  31. 2022Lower Bounds for Learning Quantum States with Single-Copy Measurementscited by 8
  32. 2022Inference-Based Quantum Sensingcited by 7
  33. 2022Optimal quantum dataset for learning a unitary transformationcited by 6
  34. 2022Quantum tomography using state-preparation unitariescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.