mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparative Validation of AI and non-AI Methods in MRI Volumetry to Diagnose Parkinsonian Syndromes

arXiv 2207.11534 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2022eess.IV cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated segmentation and volumetry of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are essential for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) and Parkinson's plus syndromes (P-plus). To enhance the diagnostic performance, we adopt deep learning (DL) models in brain segmentation and compared their performance with the gold-standard non-DL method. We collected brain MRI scans of healthy controls (n=105) and patients with PD (n=105), multiple systemic atrophy (n=132), and progressive supranuclear palsy (n=69) at Samsung Medical Center from January 2017 to December 2020. Using the gold-standard non-DL model, FreeSurfer (FS), we segmented six brain structures: midbrain, pons, caudate, putamen, pallidum, and third ventricle, and considered them as annotating data for DL models, the representative V-Net and UNETR. The Dice scores and area under the curve (AUC) for differentiating normal, PD, and P-plus cases were calculated. The segmentation times of V-Net and UNETR for the six brain structures per patient were 3.48 +- 0.17 and 48.14 +- 0.97 s, respectively, being at least 300 times faster than FS (15,735 +- 1.07 s). Dice scores of both DL models were sufficiently high (>0.85), and their AUCs for disease classification were superior to that of FS. For classification of normal vs. P-plus and PD vs. multiple systemic atrophy (cerebellar type), the DL models and FS showed AUCs above 0.8. DL significantly reduces the analysis time without compromising the performance of brain segmentation and differential diagnosis. Our findings may contribute to the adoption of DL brain MRI segmentation in clinical settings and advance brain research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 97 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2022.

Builds on

18 of 97 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  5. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  6. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,422
  7. 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,479
  8. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,292
  9. 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,620
  10. 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,435
  11. 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,369
  12. 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,133
6 more
  1. 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 959
  2. 2020Pre-Trained Image Processing Transformercited by 893
  3. 2022Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Imagescited by 830
  4. 2017Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 401
  5. 2021Colorization Transformercited by 89
  6. 2018Knowing what you know in brain segmentation using Bayesian deep neural networkscited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.