Democratizing Ethical Assessment of Natural Language Generation Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Natural language generation models are computer systems that generate coherent language when prompted with a sequence of words as context. Despite their ubiquity and many beneficial applications, language generation models also have the potential to inflict social harms by generating discriminatory language, hateful speech, profane content, and other harmful material. Ethical assessment of these models is therefore critical. But it is also a challenging task, requiring an expertise in several specialized domains, such as computational linguistics and social justice. While significant strides have been made by the research community in this domain, accessibility of such ethical assessments to the wider population is limited due to the high entry barriers. This article introduces a new tool to democratize and standardize ethical assessment of natural language generation models: Tool for Ethical Assessment of Language generation models (TEAL), a component of Credo AI Lens, an open-source assessment framework.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2022.
Builds on
27 of 42 references.
References · 27
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,549
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,999
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,810
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,249
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,248
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 964
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 763
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 731
- 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
- 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 411
15 more
- 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 296
- 2019Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Mediacited by 270
- 2021Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detectioncited by 261
- 2018Plan-And-Write: Towards Better Automatic Storytellingcited by 232
- 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 215
- 2021Societal Biases in Language Generation: Progress and Challengescited by 202
- 2022What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?cited by 195
- 2021Process for Adapting Language Models to Society (PALMS) with Values-Targeted Datasetscited by 181
- 2021RedditBias: A Real-World Resource for Bias Evaluation and Debiasing of Conversational Language Modelscited by 149
- 2017Deceiving Google's Perspective API Built for Detecting Toxic Commentscited by 102
- 2019Neural Machine Translation: A Review and Surveycited by 100
- 2019Pretraining-Based Natural Language Generation for Text Summarizationcited by 40
- 2020Defining and Evaluating Fair Natural Language Generationcited by 17
- 2021Software-Based Dialogue Systems: Survey, Taxonomy and Challengescited by 11
- 2020CLARA: Clinical Report Auto-completioncited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.