mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Poisson binomial mechanism for secure and private federated learning

arXiv 2207.09916 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2022cs.CR cs.IT cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce the Poisson Binomial mechanism (PBM), a discrete differential privacy mechanism for distributed mean estimation (DME) with applications to federated learning and analytics. We provide a tight analysis of its privacy guarantees, showing that it achieves the same privacy-accuracy trade-offs as the continuous Gaussian mechanism. Our analysis is based on a novel bound on the R'enyi divergence of two Poisson binomial distributions that may be of independent interest. Unlike previous discrete DP schemes based on additive noise, our mechanism encodes local information into a parameter of the binomial distribution, and hence the output distribution is discrete with bounded support. Moreover, the support does not increase as the privacy budget varepsilon rightarrow 0 as in the case of additive schemes which require the addition of more noise to achieve higher privacy; on the contrary, the support becomes smaller as varepsilon rightarrow 0. The bounded support enables us to combine our mechanism with secure aggregation (SecAgg), a multi-party cryptographic protocol, without the need of performing modular clipping which results in an unbiased estimator of the sum of the local vectors. This in turn allows us to apply it in the private FL setting and provide an upper bound on the convergence rate of the SGD algorithm. Moreover, since the support of the output distribution becomes smaller as varepsilon rightarrow 0, the communication cost of our scheme decreases with the privacy constraint varepsilon, outperforming all previous distributed DP schemes based on additive noise in the high privacy or low communication regimes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2022.

Builds on

22 of 40 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  3. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  4. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
  5. 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 724
  6. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
  7. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
  8. 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 459
  9. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 346
  10. 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 236
  11. 2016Practical Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning on User-Held Datacited by 178
  12. 2018Expanding the Reach of Federated Learning by Reducing Client Resource Requirementscited by 163
10 more
  1. 2018cpSGD: Communication-efficient and differentially-private distributed SGDcited by 158
  2. 2016Distributed Mean Estimation with Limited Communicationcited by 136
  3. 2020The Discrete Gaussian for Differential Privacycited by 135
  4. 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 128
  5. 2018Distributed Differential Privacy via Shufflingcited by 115
  6. 2020Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Trilemmacited by 68
  7. 2021The Skellam Mechanism for Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 68
  8. 2016Discrete Distribution Estimation under Local Privacycited by 59
  9. 2015Statistical Query Algorithms for Mean Vector Estimation and Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 41
  10. 2020A Better Bound Gives a Hundred Rounds: Enhanced Privacy Guarantees via f-Divergencescited by 21

Built on by

Not cited yet.