mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DTG-SSOD: Dense Teacher Guidance for Semi-Supervised Object Detection

arXiv 2207.05536 ↗First posted 12 Jul 2022cs.CV cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Mean-Teacher (MT) scheme is widely adopted in semi-supervised object detection (SSOD). In MT, the sparse pseudo labels, offered by the final predictions of the teacher (e.g., after Non Maximum Suppression (NMS) post-processing), are adopted for the dense supervision for the student via hand-crafted label assignment. However, the sparse-to-dense paradigm complicates the pipeline of SSOD, and simultaneously neglects the powerful direct, dense teacher supervision. In this paper, we attempt to directly leverage the dense guidance of teacher to supervise student training, i.e., the dense-to-dense paradigm. Specifically, we propose the Inverse NMS Clustering (INC) and Rank Matching (RM) to instantiate the dense supervision, without the widely used, conventional sparse pseudo labels. INC leads the student to group candidate boxes into clusters in NMS as the teacher does, which is implemented by learning grouping information revealed in NMS procedure of the teacher. After obtaining the same grouping scheme as the teacher via INC, the student further imitates the rank distribution of the teacher over clustered candidates through Rank Matching. With the proposed INC and RM, we integrate Dense Teacher Guidance into Semi-Supervised Object Detection (termed DTG-SSOD), successfully abandoning sparse pseudo labels and enabling more informative learning on unlabeled data. On COCO benchmark, our DTG-SSOD achieves state-of-the-art performance under various labelling ratios. For example, under 10% labelling ratio, DTG-SSOD improves the supervised baseline from 26.9 to 35.9 mAP, outperforming the previous best method Soft Teacher by 1.9 points.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2022.

Builds on

30 of 45 references.

References · 30

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  5. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  6. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
  7. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  8. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
  9. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,060
  10. 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 752
  11. 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 540
  12. 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 540
18 more
  1. 2020Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 512
  2. 2020Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object Detectioncited by 409
  3. 2021End-to-End Semi-Supervised Object Detection with Soft Teachercited by 316
  4. 2021Unbiased Teacher for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 306
  5. 2020A Simple Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Object Detectioncited by 282
  6. 2020VarifocalNet: An IoU-aware Dense Object Detectorcited by 231
  7. 2021DetCo: Unsupervised Contrastive Learning for Object Detectioncited by 205
  8. 2018Acquisition of Localization Confidence for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 176
  9. 2021Humble Teachers Teach Better Students for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 116
  10. 2021Instant-Teaching: An End-to-End Semi-Supervised Object Detection Frameworkcited by 113
  11. 2021Aligning Pretraining for Detection via Object-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 110
  12. 2020Generalized Focal Loss V2: Learning Reliable Localization Quality Estimation for Dense Object Detectioncited by 104
  13. 2021Spatially Consistent Representation Learningcited by 64
  14. 2022PseCo: Pseudo Labeling and Consistency Training for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 51
  15. 2021Rethinking Pseudo Labels for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 45
  16. 2021Knowledge Distillation for Object Detection via Rank Mimicking and Prediction-guided Feature Imitationcited by 40
  17. 2021MUM : Mix Image Tiles and UnMix Feature Tiles for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 21
  18. 2022Scale-Equivalent Distillation for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 5; 2025: 1.

12 papers.