A Study of Syntactic Multi-Modality in Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is difficult for non-autoregressive translation (NAT) models to capture the multi-modal distribution of target translations due to their conditional independence assumption, which is known as the "multi-modality problem", including the lexical multi-modality and the syntactic multi-modality. While the first one has been well studied, the syntactic multi-modality brings severe challenge to the standard cross entropy (XE) loss in NAT and is under studied. In this paper, we conduct a systematic study on the syntactic multi-modality problem. Specifically, we decompose it into short- and long-range syntactic multi-modalities and evaluate several recent NAT algorithms with advanced loss functions on both carefully designed synthesized datasets and real datasets. We find that the Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) loss and the Order-Agnostic Cross Entropy (OAXE) loss can better handle short- and long-range syntactic multi-modalities respectively. Furthermore, we take the best of both and design a new loss function to better handle the complicated syntactic multi-modality in real-world datasets. To facilitate practical usage, we provide a guide to use different loss functions for different kinds of syntactic multi-modality.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2022.
Builds on
13 of 35 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2017Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 457
- 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
- 2019Understanding Knowledge Distillation in Non-autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 121
- 2020Glancing Transformer for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 103
- 2020Fully Non-autoregressive Neural Machine Translation: Tricks of the Tradecited by 99
- 2020Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation with Latent Alignmentscited by 96
- 2018End-to-End Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation with Connectionist Temporal Classificationcited by 72
- 2020Aligned Cross Entropy for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 65
- 2021Order-Agnostic Cross Entropy for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 57
- 2020Understanding and Improving Lexical Choice in Non-Autoregressive Translationcited by 55
- 2019Minimizing the Bag-of-Ngrams Difference for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 40
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Fuzzy Alignments in Directed Acyclic Graph for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 11
- 2023Non-autoregressive Machine Translation with Probabilistic Context-free Grammarcited by 4
- 2024Unlocking the Capabilities of Masked Generative Models for Image Synthesis via Self-Guidancecited by 3
- 2023Controlled Text Generation for Black-box Language Models via Score-based Progressive Editorcited by 2
- 2026FastDiSS: Few-step Match Many-step Diffusion Language Model on Sequence-to-Sequence Generation--Full Versioncited by 2
- 2026FastDiSS: Few-step Match Many-step Diffusion Language Model on Sequence-to-Sequence Generation--Full Version7 Apr 2026
- 2024Unlocking the Capabilities of Masked Generative Models for Image Synthesis via Self-Guidance17 Oct 2024
- 2023Non-autoregressive Machine Translation with Probabilistic Context-free Grammar14 Nov 2023
- 2023Controlled Text Generation for Black-box Language Models via Score-based Progressive Editor13 Nov 2023
- 2023Fuzzy Alignments in Directed Acyclic Graph for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation12 Mar 2023