UIILD: A Unified Interpretable Intelligent Learning Diagnosis Framework for Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Intelligent learning diagnosis is a critical engine of intelligent tutoring systems, which aims to estimate learners' current knowledge mastery status and predict their future learning performance. The significant challenge with traditional learning diagnosis methods is the inability to balance diagnostic accuracy and interpretability. Although the existing psychometric-based learning diagnosis methods provide some domain interpretation through cognitive parameters, they have insufficient modeling capability with a shallow structure for large-scale learning data. While the deep learning-based learning diagnosis methods have improved the accuracy of learning performance prediction, their inherent black-box properties lead to a lack of interpretability, making their results untrustworthy for educational applications. To settle the above problem, the proposed unified interpretable intelligent learning diagnosis (UIILD) framework, which benefits from the powerful representation learning ability of deep learning and the interpretability of psychometrics, achieves a better performance of learning prediction and provides interpretability from three aspects: cognitive parameters, learner-resource response network, and weights of self-attention mechanism. Within the proposed framework, this paper presents a two-channel learning diagnosis mechanism LDM-ID as well as a three-channel learning diagnosis mechanism LDM-HMI. Experiments on two real-world datasets and a simulation dataset show that our method has higher accuracy in predicting learners' performances compared with the state-of-the-art models, and can provide valuable educational interpretability for applications such as precise learning resource recommendation and personalized learning tutoring in intelligent tutoring systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2022.
Builds on
8 of 76 references.
References · 8
- 2015Deep Knowledge Tracingcited by 328
- 2020Context-Aware Attentive Knowledge Tracingcited by 172
- 2016Dynamic Key-Value Memory Networks for Knowledge Tracingcited by 170
- 2019A Self-Attentive model for Knowledge Tracingcited by 169
- 2020Towards an Appropriate Query, Key, and Value Computation for Knowledge Tracingcited by 79
- 2020GIKT: A Graph-based Interaction Model for Knowledge Tracingcited by 51
- 2021Deep Graph Memory Networks for Forgetting-Robust Knowledge Tracingcited by 17
- 2020Towards Interpretable Deep Learning Models for Knowledge Tracingcited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.