mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Continuous Sign Language Recognition via Temporal Super-Resolution Network

arXiv 2207.00928 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2022cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Aiming at the problem that the spatial-temporal hierarchical continuous sign language recognition model based on deep learning has a large amount of computation, which limits the real-time application of the model, this paper proposes a temporal super-resolution network(TSRNet). The data is reconstructed into a dense feature sequence to reduce the overall model computation while keeping the final recognition accuracy loss to a minimum. The continuous sign language recognition model(CSLR) via TSRNet mainly consists of three parts: frame-level feature extraction, time series feature extraction and TSRNet, where TSRNet is located between frame-level feature extraction and time-series feature extraction, which mainly includes two branches: detail descriptor and rough descriptor. The sparse frame-level features are fused through the features obtained by the two designed branches as the reconstructed dense frame-level feature sequence, and the connectionist temporal classification(CTC) loss is used for training and optimization after the time-series feature extraction part. To better recover semantic-level information, the overall model is trained with the self-generating adversarial training method proposed in this paper to reduce the model error rate. The training method regards the TSRNet as the generator, and the frame-level processing part and the temporal processing part as the discriminator. In addition, in order to unify the evaluation criteria of model accuracy loss under different benchmarks, this paper proposes word error rate deviation(WERD), which takes the error rate between the estimated word error rate (WER) and the reference WER obtained by the reconstructed frame-level feature sequence and the complete original frame-level feature sequence as the WERD. Experiments on two large-scale sign language datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2022.

Builds on

16 of 54 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  4. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
  5. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,054
  6. 2014Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 1,224
  7. 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 902
  8. 2020FLAVR: Flow-Agnostic Video Representations for Fast Frame Interpolationcited by 98
  9. 2018Video-based Sign Language Recognition without Temporal Segmentationcited by 88
  10. 2021Visual Alignment Constraint for Continuous Sign Language Recognitioncited by 80
  11. 2020Spatial-Temporal Multi-Cue Network for Continuous Sign Language Recognitioncited by 74
  12. 2020Multiple Video Frame Interpolation via Enhanced Deformable Separable Convolutioncited by 63
4 more
  1. 2020Video Super Resolution Based on Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 54
  2. 2021Using Motion History Images with 3D Convolutional Networks in Isolated Sign Language Recognitioncited by 12
  3. 2016End-to-End Image Super-Resolution via Deep and Shallow Convolutional Networkscited by 6
  4. 2022Multi-scale temporal network for continuous sign language recognitioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.