Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection with Few Positive Samples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given the scarcity of anomalies in real-world applications, the majority of literature has been focusing on modeling normality. The learned representations enable anomaly detection as the normality model is trained to capture certain key underlying data regularities under normal circumstances. In practical settings, particularly industrial time series anomaly detection, we often encounter situations where a large amount of normal operation data is available along with a small number of anomaly events collected over time. This practical situation calls for methodologies to leverage these small number of anomaly events to create a better anomaly detector. In this paper, we introduce two methodologies to address the needs of this practical situation and compared them with recently developed state of the art techniques. Our proposed methods anchor on representative learning of normal operation with autoregressive (AR) model along with loss components to encourage representations that separate normal versus few positive examples. We applied the proposed methods to two industrial anomaly detection datasets and demonstrated effective performance in comparison with approaches from literature. Our study also points out additional challenges with adopting such methods in practical applications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2022.
Builds on
10 of 29 references.
References · 10
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,710
- 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,447
- 2018Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 407
- 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 357
- 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 290
- 2016LSTM-based Encoder-Decoder for Multi-sensor Anomaly Detectioncited by 213
- 2017A Multimodal Anomaly Detector for Robot-Assisted Feeding Using an LSTM-based Variational Autoencodercited by 209
- 2019Fault Detection and Identification using Bayesian Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.