Zero Stability Well Predicts Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The question of what kind of convolutional neural network (CNN) structure performs well is fascinating. In this work, we move toward the answer with one more step by connecting zero stability and model performance. Specifically, we found that if a discrete solver of an ordinary differential equation is zero stable, the CNN corresponding to that solver performs well. We first give the interpretation of zero stability in the context of deep learning and then investigate the performance of existing first- and second-order CNNs under different zero-stable circumstances. Based on the preliminary observation, we provide a higher-order discretization to construct CNNs and then propose a zero-stable network (ZeroSNet). To guarantee zero stability of the ZeroSNet, we first deduce a structure that meets consistency conditions and then give a zero stable region of a training-free parameter. By analyzing the roots of a characteristic equation, we theoretically obtain the optimal coefficients of feature maps. Empirically, we present our results from three aspects: We provide extensive empirical evidence of different depth on different datasets to show that the moduli of the characteristic equation's roots are the keys for the performance of CNNs that require historical features; Our experiments show that ZeroSNet outperforms existing CNNs which is based on high-order discretization; ZeroSNets show better robustness against noises on the input. The source code is available at urlhttps://github.com/LongJin-lab/ZeroSNet.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2022.
Builds on
20 of 31 references.
References · 20
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
- 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,492
- 2017Stable Architectures for Deep Neural Networkscited by 341
- 2017Beyond Finite Layer Neural Networks: Bridging Deep Architectures and Numerical Differential Equationscited by 203
- 2018Deep Neural Networks Motivated by Partial Differential Equationscited by 187
- 2019Exploring Randomly Wired Neural Networks for Image Recognitioncited by 103
- 2019On Robustness of Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 83
- 2016PolyNet: A Pursuit of Structural Diversity in Very Deep Networkscited by 39
8 more
- 2019IMEXnet: A Forward Stable Deep Neural Networkcited by 22
- 2018Convolutional Neural Networks combined with Runge-Kutta Methodscited by 18
- 2018ResNets Ensemble via the Feynman-Kac Formalism to Improve Natural and Robust Accuraciescited by 18
- 2019Towards Robust ResNet: A Small Step but A Giant Leapcited by 15
- 2021Activated Gradients for Deep Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2018Forward Stability of ResNet and Its Variantscited by 12
- 2021Improving Robustness and Uncertainty Modelling in Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 7
- 2019Review: Ordinary Differential Equations For Deep Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.