mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Robustness and Uncertainty Modelling in Neural Ordinary Differential Equations

arXiv 2112.12707 ↗First posted 23 Dec 2021cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural ordinary differential equations (NODE) have been proposed as a continuous depth generalization to popular deep learning models such as Residual networks (ResNets). They provide parameter efficiency and automate the model selection process in deep learning models to some extent. However, they lack the much-required uncertainty modelling and robustness capabilities which are crucial for their use in several real-world applications such as autonomous driving and healthcare. We propose a novel and unique approach to model uncertainty in NODE by considering a distribution over the end-time T of the ODE solver. The proposed approach, latent time NODE (LT-NODE), treats T as a latent variable and apply Bayesian learning to obtain a posterior distribution over T from the data. In particular, we use variational inference to learn an approximate posterior and the model parameters. Prediction is done by considering the NODE representations from different samples of the posterior and can be done efficiently using a single forward pass. As T implicitly defines the depth of a NODE, posterior distribution over T would also help in model selection in NODE. We also propose, adaptive latent time NODE (ALT-NODE), which allow each data point to have a distinct posterior distribution over end-times. ALT-NODE uses amortized variational inference to learn an approximate posterior using inference networks. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches in modelling uncertainty and robustness through experiments on synthetic and several real-world image classification data.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2021.

Builds on

17 of 27 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  5. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  6. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
  7. 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
  8. 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 590
  9. 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 440
  10. 2019Augmented Neural ODEscited by 396
  11. 2013Gaussian Processes for Big Datacited by 377
  12. 2019Neural Jump Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 147
5 more
  1. 2016Stochastic Variational Deep Kernel Learningcited by 92
  2. 2019ANODE: Unconditionally Accurate Memory-Efficient Gradients for Neural ODEscited by 83
  3. 2019On Robustness of Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 83
  4. 2017MIT Advanced Vehicle Technology Study: Large-Scale Naturalistic Driving Study of Driver Behavior and Interaction with Automationcited by 15
  5. 2018Heteroscedastic Gaussian processes for uncertainty modeling in large-scale crowdsourced traffic datacited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

7 papers.