mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transferring Fairness under Distribution Shifts via Fair Consistency Regularization

arXiv 2206.12796 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.CYcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing reliance on ML models in high-stakes tasks has raised a major concern on fairness violations. Although there has been a surge of work that improves algorithmic fairness, most of them are under the assumption of an identical training and test distribution. In many real-world applications, however, such an assumption is often violated as previously trained fair models are often deployed in a different environment, and the fairness of such models has been observed to collapse. In this paper, we study how to transfer model fairness under distribution shifts, a widespread issue in practice. We conduct a fine-grained analysis of how the fair model is affected under different types of distribution shifts and find that domain shifts are more challenging than subpopulation shifts. Inspired by the success of self-training in transferring accuracy under domain shifts, we derive a sufficient condition for transferring group fairness. Guided by it, we propose a practical algorithm with a fair consistency regularization as the key component. A synthetic dataset benchmark, which covers all types of distribution shifts, is deployed for experimental verification of the theoretical findings. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets including image and tabular data demonstrate that our approach effectively transfers fairness and accuracy under various distribution shifts.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2022.

Builds on

57 of 80 references.

References · 57

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  2. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  3. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  4. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  5. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  6. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  7. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  8. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  9. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
  10. 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,309
  11. 2017CyCADA: Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 1,079
  12. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
38 more
  1. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  2. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  3. 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 614
  4. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  5. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
  6. 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 426
  7. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  8. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  9. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  10. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
  11. 2018A DIRT-T Approach to Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 215
  12. 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
  13. 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
  14. 2020Theoretical Analysis of Self-Training with Deep Networks on Unlabeled Datacited by 179
  15. 2021A Fine-Grained Analysis on Distribution Shiftcited by 171
  16. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  17. 2020Understanding Self-Training for Gradual Domain Adaptationcited by 149
  18. 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
  19. 2020Domain Adaptation with Conditional Distribution Matching and Generalized Label Shiftcited by 124
  20. 2021Self-supervised Learning is More Robust to Dataset Imbalancecited by 122
  21. 2021Cycle Self-Training for Domain Adaptationcited by 120
  22. 2021Fair Mixup: Fairness via Interpolationcited by 109
  23. 2021AdaMatch: A Unified Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning and Domain Adaptationcited by 104
  24. 2019FairFace: Face Attribute Dataset for Balanced Race, Gender, and Agecited by 87
  25. 2021Extending the WILDS Benchmark for Unsupervised Adaptationcited by 85
  26. 2018Learning Controllable Fair Representationscited by 83
  27. 2020Model Patching: Closing the Subgroup Performance Gap with Data Augmentationcited by 82
  28. 2019Conditional Learning of Fair Representationscited by 78
  29. 2020Self-training Avoids Using Spurious Features Under Domain Shiftcited by 69
  30. 2019Domain Adaptation with Asymmetrically-Relaxed Distribution Alignmentcited by 61
  31. 2019Leveraging Labeled and Unlabeled Data for Consistent Fair Binary Classificationcited by 60
  32. 2020Robust Fairness under Covariate Shiftcited by 58
  33. 2021A Theory of Label Propagation for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 48
  34. 2021FARF: A Fair and Adaptive Random Forests Classifiercited by 37
  35. 2019Transfer of Machine Learning Fairness across Domainscited by 36
  36. 2020Ensuring Fairness Beyond the Training Datacited by 35
  37. 2020Rethinking Distributional Matching Based Domain Adaptationcited by 33
  38. 2021The Rich Get Richer: Disparate Impact of Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 28

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 9; 2024: 7; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

21 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2024Supervised Algorithmic Fairness in Distribution Shifts: A Surveycited by 23
  2. 2023Improving Fair Training under Correlation Shiftscited by 14
  3. 2023Chasing Fairness Under Distribution Shift: A Model Weight Perturbation Approachcited by 12
  4. 2024Fair Bilevel Neural Network (FairBiNN): On Balancing fairness and accuracy via Stackelberg Equilibriumcited by 9
  5. 2023Algorithmic Fairness Generalization under Covariate and Dependence Shifts Simultaneouslycited by 7
  6. 2023Retiring DeltaDP: New Distribution-Level Metrics for Demographic Paritycited by 4
  7. 2023The Limits of Fair Medical Imaging AI In The Wildcited by 4
  8. 2024SimFair: Physics-Guided Fairness-Aware Learning with Simulation Modelscited by 4
  9. 2023FairDP: Certified Fairness with Differential Privacycited by 3
  10. 2024Referee-Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Locational Fairnesscited by 3
  11. 2022A Survey on Preserving Fairness Guarantees in Changing Environmentscited by 2
  12. 2023Adapting Machine Learning Diagnostic Models to New Populations Using a Small Amount of Data: Results from Clinical Neurosciencecited by 2
9 more
  1. 2023Fairness under Covariate Shift: Improving Fairness-Accuracy tradeoff with few Unlabeled Test Samplescited by 2
  2. 2023Dr. FERMI: A Stochastic Distributionally Robust Fair Empirical Risk Minimization Frameworkcited by 1
  3. 2024A Note on Bias to Completecited by 1
  4. 2025Face4FairShifts: A Large Image Benchmark for Fairness and Robust Learning across Visual Domainscited by 1
  5. 2024Evaluation of Predictive Reliability to Foster Trust in Artificial Intelligence. A case study in Multiple Sclerosiscited by 0
  6. 2024Accurately Classifying Out-Of-Distribution Data in Facial Recognitioncited by 0
  7. 2025A Critical Review of Predominant Bias in Neural Networkscited by 0
  8. 2025Whence Is A Model Fair? Fixing Fairness Bugs via Propensity Score Matchingcited by 0
  9. 2026RoAD Benchmark: How LiDAR Models Fail under Coupled Domain Shifts and Label Evolutioncited by 0