mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Penalty Weights in QUBO Formulations: Permutation Problems

arXiv 2206.11040 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2022math.OC cs.AI cs.DMcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Optimisation algorithms designed to work on quantum computers or other specialised hardware have been of research interest in recent years. Many of these solver can only optimise problems that are in binary and quadratic form. Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimisation (QUBO) is therefore a common formulation used by these solvers. There are many combinatorial optimisation problems that are naturally represented as permutations e.g., travelling salesman problem. Encoding permutation problems using binary variables however presents some challenges. Many QUBO solvers are single flip solvers, it is therefore possible to generate solutions that cannot be decoded to a valid permutation. To create bias towards generating feasible solutions, we use penalty weights. The process of setting static penalty weights for various types of problems is not trivial. This is because values that are too small will lead to infeasible solutions being returned by the solver while values that are too large may lead to slower convergence. In this study, we explore some methods of setting penalty weights within the context of QUBO formulations. We propose new static methods of calculating penalty weights which lead to more promising results than existing methods.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2022.

Builds on

6 of 24 references.

References · 6

  1. 2013Ising formulations of many NP problemscited by 204
  2. 2021Quantum Permutation Synchronizationcited by 32
  3. 2015Solving the Optimal Trading Trajectory Problem Using a Quantum Annealercited by 12
  4. 2020Digital Annealer for quadratic unconstrained binary optimization: a comparative performance analysiscited by 4
  5. 2020A Hybrid Framework Using a QUBO Solver For Permutation-Based Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 2
  6. 2019Kernels of Mallows Models under the Hamming Distance for solving the Quadratic Assignment Problemcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

9 papers.