mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GNN-Guided Graph Coarsening and Adaptive QUBO Penalties for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows on a Quantum Annealer

arXiv 2609.04593 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph coarsening reduces the large Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formulations arising when vehicle-routing problems are solved by quantum annealing. Nearby customers with compatible time windows are merged into super-nodes, the reduced problem is solved, and the solution is expanded to the original graph. For the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows (CVRPTW), existing coarsening heuristics require family-specific tuning and remain unreliable on random instances. We address these limitations on the Solomon benchmark using simulated annealing and a D-Wave Advantage2 processor. We first introduce adaptive penalty calibration. Uniform penalty scaling has little effect, whereas controlling the internal coefficient range substantially improves raw samples. Removing non-binding constraints, normalising binding ones, and scaling the remaining penalties reduces mean raw constraint violations from 33.0 to 0.06 at the same solver budget (p=3.7e-11, n=56). A variable-count-preserving control attributes this gain to conditioning rather than problem size. Second, we replace the hand-tuned merge score with a graph neural network (GNN) using one configuration across all families. At N=10, it achieves 100% feasibility across all Solomon families, including R-type (100% vs. 80% for the tuned heuristic). Across N=10,...,100, feasibility is 83% vs. 69%, with the GNN better or tied on 85/90 instance-size pairs. At N=80,100, the difference is significant (p=0.002; 25/25 pairs), while the QUBO remains approximately 5-6 times smaller. Finally, hardware experiments reproduce the conditioning effect at fixed logical variable count: feasible samples increase from 0.02% to 39% across 13 instances. Classical repair with local search remains a reference bound for end-to-end solution cost.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 23 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  2. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
  3. 2018Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizoncited by 612
  4. 2021Combinatorial optimization and reasoning with graph neural networkscited by 267
  5. 2017Thinking Fast and Slow with Deep Learning and Tree Searchcited by 245
  6. 2013Ising formulations of many NP problemscited by 204
  7. 2022Modern graph neural networks do worse than classical greedy algorithms in solving combinatorial optimization problems like maximum independent setcited by 33
  8. 2014A practical heuristic for finding graph minorscited by 26
  9. 2022Penalty Weights in QUBO Formulations: Permutation Problemscited by 9
  10. 2019Quantum Annealing of Vehicle Routing Problem with Time, State and Capacitycited by 5
  11. 2025Graph-Coarsening Approach for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windowscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.