mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Gray Learning from Non-IID Data with Out-of-distribution Samples

arXiv 2206.09375 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2022cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The integrity of training data, even when annotated by experts, is far from guaranteed, especially for non-IID datasets comprising both in- and out-of-distribution samples. In an ideal scenario, the majority of samples would be in-distribution, while samples that deviate semantically would be identified as out-of-distribution and excluded during the annotation process. However, experts may erroneously classify these out-of-distribution samples as in-distribution, assigning them labels that are inherently unreliable. This mixture of unreliable labels and varied data types makes the task of learning robust neural networks notably challenging. We observe that both in- and out-of-distribution samples can almost invariably be ruled out from belonging to certain classes, aside from those corresponding to unreliable ground-truth labels. This opens the possibility of utilizing reliable complementary labels that indicate the classes to which a sample does not belong. Guided by this insight, we introduce a novel approach, termed textitGray Learning (GL), which leverages both ground-truth and complementary labels. Crucially, GL adaptively adjusts the loss weights for these two label types based on prediction confidence levels. By grounding our approach in statistical learning theory, we derive bounds for the generalization error, demonstrating that GL achieves tight constraints even in non-IID settings. Extensive experimental evaluations reveal that our method significantly outperforms alternative approaches grounded in robust statistics.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2022.

Builds on

34 of 60 references.

References · 34

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  5. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  6. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  7. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  8. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  9. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  10. 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
  11. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  12. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
22 more
  1. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  2. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  3. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
  4. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  5. 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 451
  6. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  7. 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
  8. 2018Learning and Generalization in Overparameterized Neural Networks, Going Beyond Two Layerscited by 340
  9. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  10. 2021No Fear of Heterogeneity: Classifier Calibration for Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 241
  11. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  12. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  13. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  14. 2020Hybrid Models for Open Set Recognitioncited by 109
  15. 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
  16. 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
  17. 2018Generative Adversarial Active Learning for Unsupervised Outlier Detectioncited by 65
  18. 2019Robust Learning from Untrusted Sourcescited by 27
  19. 2020Unsupervised Heterogeneous Coupling Learning for Categorical Representationcited by 13
  20. 2018Collective decision for open set recognitioncited by 10
  21. 2017Efficient PAC Learning from the Crowdcited by 7
  22. 2021Homophily Outlier Detection in Non-IID Categorical Datacited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.