mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bag of Image Patch Embedding Behind the Success of Self-Supervised Learning

arXiv 2206.08954 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-supervised learning (SSL) has recently achieved tremendous empirical advancements in learning image representation. However, our understanding of the principle behind learning such a representation is still limited. This work shows that joint-embedding SSL approaches primarily learn a representation of image patches, which reflects their co-occurrence. Such a connection to co-occurrence modeling can be established formally, and it supplements the prevailing invariance perspective. We empirically show that learning a representation for fixed-scale patches and aggregating local patch representations as the image representation achieves similar or even better results than the baseline methods. We denote this process as BagSSL. Even with 32x32 patch representation, BagSSL achieves 62% top-1 linear probing accuracy on ImageNet. On the other hand, with a multi-scale pretrained model, we show that the whole image embedding is approximately the average of local patch embeddings. While the SSL representation is relatively invariant at the global scale, we show that locality is preserved when we zoom into local patch-level representation. Further, we show that patch representation aggregation can improve various SOTA baseline methods by a large margin. The patch representation is considerably easier to understand, and this work makes a step to demystify self-supervised representation learning.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2022.

Builds on

25 of 38 references.

References · 25

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  6. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  7. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  8. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  9. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
  10. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  11. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,838
  12. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
13 more
  1. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,013
  2. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 311
  3. 2020Whitening for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 278
  4. 2019Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNetcited by 260
  5. 2022Patches Are All You Need?cited by 201
  6. 2021Decoupled Contrastive Learningcited by 141
  7. 2021Solo-learn: A Library of Self-supervised Methods for Visual Representation Learningcited by 116
  8. 2022On the duality between contrastive and non-contrastive self-supervised learningcited by 107
  9. 2020Learning Representations by Predicting Bags of Visual Wordscited by 73
  10. 2021High Fidelity Visualization of What Your Self-Supervised Representation Knows Aboutcited by 64
  11. 2022Neural Manifold Clustering and Embeddingcited by 44
  12. 2018The Sparse Manifold Transformcited by 36
  13. 2021The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Patches in Deep Convolutional Kernels Methodscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

9 papers.