mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Patches in Deep Convolutional Kernels Methods

arXiv 2101.07528 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A recent line of work showed that various forms of convolutional kernel methods can be competitive with standard supervised deep convolutional networks on datasets like CIFAR-10, obtaining accuracies in the range of 87-90% while being more amenable to theoretical analysis. In this work, we highlight the importance of a data-dependent feature extraction step that is key to the obtain good performance in convolutional kernel methods. This step typically corresponds to a whitened dictionary of patches, and gives rise to a data-driven convolutional kernel methods. We extensively study its effect, demonstrating it is the key ingredient for high performance of these methods. Specifically, we show that one of the simplest instances of such kernel methods, based on a single layer of image patches followed by a linear classifier is already obtaining classification accuracies on CIFAR-10 in the same range as previous more sophisticated convolutional kernel methods. We scale this method to the challenging ImageNet dataset, showing such a simple approach can exceed all existing non-learned representation methods. This is a new baseline for object recognition without representation learning methods, that initiates the investigation of convolutional kernel models on ImageNet. We conduct experiments to analyze the dictionary that we used, our ablations showing they exhibit low-dimensional properties.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2021.

Builds on

23 of 43 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  3. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  4. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  5. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
  6. 2013Do Deep Nets Really Need to be Deep?cited by 466
  7. 2017Look, Listen and Learncited by 452
  8. 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 374
  9. 2019Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNetcited by 260
  10. 2018Greedy Layerwise Learning Can Scale to ImageNetcited by 113
  11. 2017FALKON: An Optimal Large Scale Kernel Methodcited by 82
  12. 2019Enhanced Convolutional Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 76
11 more
  1. 2020Neural Kernels Without Tangentscited by 56
  2. 2014Deep Roto-Translation Scattering for Object Classificationcited by 49
  3. 2014Convolutional Kernel Networkscited by 47
  4. 2017Scaling the Scattering Transform: Deep Hybrid Networkscited by 35
  5. 2018Scattering Networks for Hybrid Representation Learningcited by 33
  6. 2016End-to-End Kernel Learning with Supervised Convolutional Kernel Networkscited by 28
  7. 2019Deep Network Classification by Scattering and Homotopy Dictionary Learningcited by 17
  8. 2018Compressing the Input for CNNs with the First-Order Scattering Transformcited by 11
  9. 2014How to Scale Up Kernel Methods to Be As Good As Deep Neural Netscited by 4
  10. 2020On the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernel of Standard Finite-Width Convolutional Neural Network Architecturescited by 3
  11. 2018A metric model for the functional architecture of the visual cortexcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

8 papers.