mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automatic Correction of Human Translations

arXiv 2206.08593 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2022cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce translation error correction (TEC), the task of automatically correcting human-generated translations. Imperfections in machine translations (MT) have long motivated systems for improving translations post-hoc with automatic post-editing. In contrast, little attention has been devoted to the problem of automatically correcting human translations, despite the intuition that humans make distinct errors that machines would be well-suited to assist with, from typos to inconsistencies in translation conventions. To investigate this, we build and release the Aced corpus with three TEC datasets. We show that human errors in TEC exhibit a more diverse range of errors and far fewer translation fluency errors than the MT errors in automatic post-editing datasets, suggesting the need for dedicated TEC models that are specialized to correct human errors. We show that pre-training instead on synthetic errors based on human errors improves TEC F-score by as much as 5.1 points. We conducted a human-in-the-loop user study with nine professional translation editors and found that the assistance of our TEC system led them to produce significantly higher quality revised translations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2022.

Builds on

15 of 25 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  4. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
  5. 2018Approaching Neural Grammatical Error Correction as a Low-Resource Machine Translation Taskcited by 56
  6. 2019Improving Grammatical Error Correction via Pre-Training a Copy-Augmented Architecture with Unlabeled Datacited by 50
  7. 2019Adding Interpretable Attention to Neural Translation Models Improves Word Alignmentcited by 30
  8. 2021Text Simplification by Taggingcited by 27
  9. 2018eSCAPE: a Large-scale Synthetic Corpus for Automatic Post-Editingcited by 18
  10. 2020Can Automatic Post-Editing Improve NMT?cited by 17
  11. 2016Log-linear Combinations of Monolingual and Bilingual Neural Machine Translation Models for Automatic Post-Editingcited by 13
  12. 2019A Simple and Effective Approach to Automatic Post-Editing with Transfer Learningcited by 11
3 more
  1. 2019Unbabel's Submission to the WMT2019 APE Shared Task: BERT-based Encoder-Decoder for Automatic Post-Editingcited by 8
  2. 2020Sentence Level Human Translation Quality Estimation with Attention-based Neural Networkscited by 2
  3. 2021Detecting over/under-translation errors for determining adequacy in human translationscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.