mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SATBench: Benchmarking the speed-accuracy tradeoff in object recognition by humans and dynamic neural networks

arXiv 2206.08427 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The core of everyday tasks like reading and driving is active object recognition. Attempts to model such tasks are currently stymied by the inability to incorporate time. People show a flexible tradeoff between speed and accuracy and this tradeoff is a crucial human skill. Deep neural networks have emerged as promising candidates for predicting peak human object recognition performance and neural activity. However, modeling the temporal dimension i.e., the speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT), is essential for them to serve as useful computational models for how humans recognize objects. To this end, we here present the first large-scale (148 observers, 4 neural networks, 8 tasks) dataset of the speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT) in recognizing ImageNet images. In each human trial, a beep, indicating the desired reaction time, sounds at a fixed delay after the image is presented, and observer's response counts only if it occurs near the time of the beep. In a series of blocks, we test many beep latencies, i.e., reaction times. We observe that human accuracy increases with reaction time and proceed to compare its characteristics with the behavior of several dynamic neural networks that are capable of inference-time adaptive computation. Using FLOPs as an analog for reaction time, we compare networks with humans on curve-fit error, category-wise correlation, and curve steepness, and conclude that cascaded dynamic neural networks are a promising model of human reaction time in object recognition tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2022.

Builds on

19 of 56 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2021Dynamic Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 405
  5. 2017SkipNet: Learning Dynamic Routing in Convolutional Networkscited by 328
  6. 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
  7. 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
  8. 2017Convolutional Networks with Adaptive Inference Graphscited by 147
  9. 2018Dynamic Channel Pruning: Feature Boosting and Suppressioncited by 129
  10. 2021Dynamic Slimmable Networkcited by 83
  11. 2018Channel Gating Neural Networkscited by 80
  12. 2019Recurrence is required to capture the representational dynamics of the human visual systemcited by 58
7 more
  1. 2018You Look Twice: GaterNet for Dynamic Filter Selection in CNNscited by 46
  2. 2016Bridging the Gaps Between Residual Learning, Recurrent Neural Networks and Visual Cortexcited by 42
  3. 2017Recurrent computations for visual pattern completioncited by 22
  4. 2019SCAN: A Scalable Neural Networks Framework Towards Compact and Efficient Modelscited by 22
  5. 2016Modeling the dynamics of human brain activity with recurrent neural networkscited by 12
  6. 2021Improving Anytime Prediction with Parallel Cascaded Networks and a Temporal-Difference Losscited by 6
  7. 2020Anytime Prediction as a Model of Human Reaction Timecited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.