READ: Aggregating Reconstruction Error into Out-of-distribution Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) samples is crucial to the safe deployment of a classifier in the real world. However, deep neural networks are known to be overconfident for abnormal data. Existing works directly design score function by mining the inconsistency from classifier for in-distribution (ID) and OOD. In this paper, we further complement this inconsistency with reconstruction error, based on the assumption that an autoencoder trained on ID data can not reconstruct OOD as well as ID. We propose a novel method, READ (Reconstruction Error Aggregated Detector), to unify inconsistencies from classifier and autoencoder. Specifically, the reconstruction error of raw pixels is transformed to latent space of classifier. We show that the transformed reconstruction error bridges the semantic gap and inherits detection performance from the original. Moreover, we propose an adjustment strategy to alleviate the overconfidence problem of autoencoder according to a fine-grained characterization of OOD data. Under two scenarios of pre-training and retraining, we respectively present two variants of our method, namely READ-MD (Mahalanobis Distance) only based on pre-trained classifier and READ-ED (Euclidean Distance) which retrains the classifier. Our methods do not require access to test time OOD data for fine-tuning hyperparameters. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods through extensive comparisons with state-of-the-art OOD detection algorithms. On a CIFAR-10 pre-trained WideResNet, our method reduces the average FPR@95TPR by up to 9.8% compared with previous state-of-the-art.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2022.
Builds on
32 of 42 references.
References · 32
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,350
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
20 more
- 2016Conditional Image Generation with PixelCNN Decoderscited by 859
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
- 2019Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 560
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 451
- 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
- 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
- 2020Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Datacited by 408
- 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 338
- 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
- 2021SSD: A Unified Framework for Self-Supervised Outlier Detectioncited by 264
- 2019Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative modelscited by 186
- 2015TurkerGaze: Crowdsourcing Saliency with Webcam based Eye Trackingcited by 165
- 2020Likelihood Regret: An Out-of-Distribution Detection Score For Variational Auto-encodercited by 145
- 2019C2AE: Class Conditioned Auto-Encoder for Open-set Recognitioncited by 142
- 2020ATOM: Robustifying Out-of-distribution Detection Using Outlier Miningcited by 116
- 2021MOOD: Multi-level Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 94
- 2018Improving Reconstruction Autoencoder Out-of-distribution Detection with Mahalanobis Distancecited by 74
- 2019Detecting semantic anomaliescited by 50
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023Data Cleaning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 9
- 2023Unsupervised Recognition of Unknown Objects for Open-World Object Detectioncited by 6
- 2024Improving Out-of-Distribution Detection by Combining Existing Post-hoc Methodscited by 2
- 2024How Out-of-Distribution Detection Learning Theory Enhances Transformer: Learnability and Reliabilitycited by 1
- 2024Collaborative Knowledge Distillation via a Learning-by-Education Node Communitycited by 1
- 2025Provably Safeguarding a Classifier from OOD and Adversarial Samples: an Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 1
- 2025Provably Safeguarding a Classifier from OOD and Adversarial Samples: an Extreme Value Theory Approach17 Jan 2025
- 2024Collaborative Knowledge Distillation via a Learning-by-Education Node Community30 Sep 2024
- 2024Improving Out-of-Distribution Detection by Combining Existing Post-hoc Methods9 Jul 2024
- 2024How Out-of-Distribution Detection Learning Theory Enhances Transformer: Learnability and Reliability13 Jun 2024
- 2023Data Cleaning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Literature Review3 Oct 2023
- 2023Unsupervised Recognition of Unknown Objects for Open-World Object Detection31 Aug 2023