mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Brownian Noise Reduction: Maximizing Privacy Subject to Accuracy Constraints

arXiv 2206.07234 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.CR cs.DScited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is a disconnect between how researchers and practitioners handle privacy-utility tradeoffs. Researchers primarily operate from a privacy first perspective, setting strict privacy requirements and minimizing risk subject to these constraints. Practitioners often desire an accuracy first perspective, possibly satisfied with the greatest privacy they can get subject to obtaining sufficiently small error. Ligett et al. have introduced a "noise reduction" algorithm to address the latter perspective. The authors show that by adding correlated Laplace noise and progressively reducing it on demand, it is possible to produce a sequence of increasingly accurate estimates of a private parameter while only paying a privacy cost for the least noisy iterate released. In this work, we generalize noise reduction to the setting of Gaussian noise, introducing the Brownian mechanism. The Brownian mechanism works by first adding Gaussian noise of high variance corresponding to the final point of a simulated Brownian motion. Then, at the practitioner's discretion, noise is gradually decreased by tracing back along the Brownian path to an earlier time. Our mechanism is more naturally applicable to the common setting of bounded ℓ2-sensitivity, empirically outperforms existing work on common statistical tasks, and provides customizable control of privacy loss over the entire interaction with the practitioner. We complement our Brownian mechanism with ReducedAboveThreshold, a generalization of the classical AboveThreshold algorithm that provides adaptive privacy guarantees. Overall, our results demonstrate that one can meet utility constraints while still maintaining strong levels of privacy.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2022.

Builds on

15 of 31 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  2. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 297
  3. 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 272
  4. 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 236
  5. 2018Time-uniform, nonparametric, nonasymptotic confidence sequencescited by 229
  6. 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 218
  7. 2018Mixture Martingales Revisited with Applications to Sequential Tests and Confidence Intervalscited by 76
  8. 2021The Skellam Mechanism for Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 68
  9. 2020Individual Privacy Accounting via a Renyi Filtercited by 59
  10. 2015Differentially Private Ordinary Least Squarescited by 36
  11. 2016Privacy Odometers and Filters: Pay-as-you-Go Compositioncited by 33
  12. 2016Understanding the Sparse Vector Technique for Differential Privacycited by 27
3 more
  1. 2022Fully Adaptive Composition in Differential Privacycited by 22
  2. 2017Accuracy First: Selecting a Differential Privacy Level for Accuracy-Constrained ERMcited by 20
  3. 2015Gradual Release of Sensitive Data under Differential Privacycited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.