mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ABCinML: Anticipatory Bias Correction in Machine Learning Applications

arXiv 2206.06960 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2022cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The idealization of a static machine-learned model, trained once and deployed forever, is not practical. As input distributions change over time, the model will not only lose accuracy, any constraints to reduce bias against a protected class may fail to work as intended. Thus, researchers have begun to explore ways to maintain algorithmic fairness over time. One line of work focuses on dynamic learning: retraining after each batch, and the other on robust learning which tries to make algorithms robust against all possible future changes. Dynamic learning seeks to reduce biases soon after they have occurred and robust learning often yields (overly) conservative models. We propose an anticipatory dynamic learning approach for correcting the algorithm to mitigate bias before it occurs. Specifically, we make use of anticipations regarding the relative distributions of population subgroups (e.g., relative ratios of male and female applicants) in the next cycle to identify the right parameters for an importance weighing fairness approach. Results from experiments over multiple real-world datasets suggest that this approach has promise for anticipatory bias correction.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2022.

Builds on

23 of 53 references.

References · 23

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  4. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  5. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  6. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  7. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
  8. 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
  9. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  10. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  11. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  12. 2018Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systemscited by 234
11 more
  1. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
  2. 2020Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilitiescited by 182
  3. 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
  4. 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
  5. 2020Robust Fairness under Covariate Shiftcited by 58
  6. 2020Fairness and Robustness in Invariant Learning: A Case Study in Toxicity Classificationcited by 32
  7. 2019Fairness-enhancing interventions in stream classificationcited by 15
  8. 2017Temporal Stability in Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 8
  9. 2021An Empirical Comparison of Bias Reduction Methods on Real-World Problems in High-Stakes Policy Settingscited by 8
  10. 2021Online Fairness-Aware Learning with Imbalanced Data Streamscited by 8
  11. 2022Balancing Fairness and Accuracy in Sentiment Detection using Multiple Black Box Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

6 papers.