Variance Reduction for Policy-Gradient Methods via Empirical Variance Minimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Policy-gradient methods in Reinforcement Learning(RL) are very universal and widely applied in practice but their performance suffers from the high variance of the gradient estimate. Several procedures were proposed to reduce it including actor-critic(AC) and advantage actor-critic(A2C) methods. Recently the approaches have got new perspective due to the introduction of Deep RL: both new control variates(CV) and new sub-sampling procedures became available in the setting of complex models like neural networks. The vital part of CV-based methods is the goal functional for the training of the CV, the most popular one is the least-squares criterion of A2C. Despite its practical success, the criterion is not the only one possible. In this paper we for the first time investigate the performance of the one called Empirical Variance(EV). We observe in the experiments that not only EV-criterion performs not worse than A2C but sometimes can be considerably better. Apart from that, we also prove some theoretical guarantees of the actual variance reduction under very general assumptions and show that A2C least-squares goal functional is an upper bound for EV goal. Our experiments indicate that in terms of variance reduction EV-based methods are much better than A2C and allow stronger variance reduction.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2022.
Builds on
19 of 32 references.
References · 19
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
- 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 734
- 2018An Introduction to Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 206
- 2019Global Convergence of Policy Gradient Methods to (Almost) Locally Optimal Policiescited by 124
- 2018Stochastic Variance-Reduced Policy Gradientcited by 106
- 2013The Optimal Reward Baseline for Gradient-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 85
- 2016Q-Prop: Sample-Efficient Policy Gradient with An Off-Policy Criticcited by 81
- 2018Variance Reduction for Policy Gradient with Action-Dependent Factorized Baselinescited by 68
- 2014Control functionals for Monte Carlo integrationcited by 59
7 more
- 2019An Improved Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Variance-Reduced Policy Gradientcited by 59
- 2018The Mirage of Action-Dependent Baselines in Reinforcement Learningcited by 48
- 2018Variance Reduction for Reinforcement Learning in Input-Driven Environmentscited by 30
- 2018Expected Policy Gradients for Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
- 2019Trajectory-wise Control Variates for Variance Reduction in Policy Gradient Methodscited by 15
- 2020Scalable Control Variates for Monte Carlo Methods via Stochastic Optimizationcited by 10
- 2017Empirical Variance Minimization with Applications in Variance Reduction and Optimal Controlcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Taylor TD-learningcited by 0
- 2024Tackling Decision Processes with Non-Cumulative Objectives using Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2024Joint Channel Selection using FedDRL in V2Xcited by 0
- 2026VICO: Visual Environments Co-Evolving for Vision-Language Model Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026VICO: Visual Environments Co-Evolving for Vision-Language Model Reasoning7 Oct 2026
- 2024Joint Channel Selection using FedDRL in V2X3 Oct 2024
- 2024Tackling Decision Processes with Non-Cumulative Objectives using Reinforcement Learning22 May 2024
- 2023Taylor TD-learning27 Feb 2023