mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Tackling Decision Processes with Non-Cumulative Objectives using Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2405.13609 ↗First posted 22 May 2024cs.LG q-fin.CP quant-phcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity

Abstract (arXiv)

Markov decision processes (MDPs) are used to model a wide variety of applications ranging from game playing over robotics to finance. Their optimal policy typically maximizes the expected sum of rewards given at each step of the decision process. However, a large class of problems does not fit straightforwardly into this framework: Non-cumulative Markov decision processes (NCMDPs), where instead of the expected sum of rewards, the expected value of an arbitrary function of the rewards is maximized. Example functions include the maximum of the rewards or their mean divided by their standard deviation. In this work, we introduce a general mapping of NCMDPs to standard MDPs. This allows all techniques developed to find optimal policies for MDPs, such as reinforcement learning or dynamic programming, to be directly applied to the larger class of NCMDPs. Focusing on reinforcement learning, we show applications in a diverse set of tasks, including classical control, portfolio optimization in finance, and discrete optimization problems. Given our approach, we can improve both final performance and training time compared to relying on standard MDPs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 14 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2024.

Builds on

14 of 45 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,592
  2. 2018Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulationcited by 645
  3. 2018Optimization of Molecules via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 200
  4. 2022Discovered Policy Optimisationcited by 103
  5. 2022Reachability Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 52
  6. 2021Safety and Liveness Guarantees through Reach-Avoid Reinforcement Learningcited by 43
  7. 2014Reach-Avoid Problems with Time-Varying Dynamics, Targets and Constraintscited by 41
  8. 2020Generating Realistic Stock Market Order Streamscited by 30
  9. 2019Graph-theoretic Simplification of Quantum Circuits with the ZX-calculuscited by 20
  10. 2020Maximum Reward Formulation In Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
  11. 2024To the Max: Reinventing Reward in Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  12. 2023Optimizing ZX-Diagrams with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
2 more
  1. 2022Variance Reduction for Policy-Gradient Methods via Empirical Variance Minimizationcited by 4
  2. 2023Reinforcement Learning with Non-Cumulative Objectivecited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.