Subject Granular Differential Privacy in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper considers subject level privacy in the FL setting, where a subject is an individual whose private information is embodied by several data items either confined within a single federation user or distributed across multiple federation users. We propose two new algorithms that enforce subject level DP at each federation user locally. Our first algorithm, called LocalGroupDP, is a straightforward application of group differential privacy in the popular DP-SGD algorithm. Our second algorithm is based on a novel idea of hierarchical gradient averaging (HiGradAvgDP) for subjects participating in a training mini-batch. We also show that user level Local Differential Privacy (LDP) naturally guarantees subject level DP. We observe the problem of horizontal composition of subject level privacy loss in FL - subject level privacy loss incurred at individual users composes across the federation. We formally prove the subject level DP guarantee for our algorithms, and also show their effect on model utility loss. Our empirical evaluation on FEMNIST and Shakespeare datasets shows that LocalGroupDP delivers the best performance among our algorithms. However, its model utility lags behind that of models trained using a DP-SGD based algorithm that provides a weaker item level privacy guarantee. Privacy loss amplification due to subject sampling fractions and horizontal composition remain key challenges for model utility.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2022.
Builds on
19 of 45 references.
References · 19
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 832
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
- 2021A Field Guide to Federated Optimizationcited by 315
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 236
- 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 218
- 2015Federated Optimization:Distributed Optimization Beyond the Datacentercited by 195
- 2019Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Optimal Ratescited by 186
- 2017Private federated learning on vertically partitioned data via entity resolution and additively homomorphic encryptioncited by 176
7 more
- 2019Federated Evaluation of On-device Personalizationcited by 147
- 2020LDP-Fed: Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacycited by 132
- 2018Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More Generalcited by 128
- 2014Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization: Efficient Algorithms and Tight Error Boundscited by 107
- 2021Learning with User-Level Privacycited by 72
- 2020Learning discrete distributions: user vs item-level privacycited by 41
- 2020Hybrid Differentially Private Federated Learning on Vertically Partitioned Datacited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022SoK: Let the Privacy Games Begin! A Unified Treatment of Data Inference Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 51
- 2024Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 31
- 2023Privacy-Aware Document Visual Question Answeringcited by 17
- 2024NeurIPS 2023 Competition: Privacy Preserving Federated Learning Document VQAcited by 2
- 2024Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: A Survey9 Dec 2024
- 2024NeurIPS 2023 Competition: Privacy Preserving Federated Learning Document VQA6 Nov 2024
- 2023Privacy-Aware Document Visual Question Answering15 Dec 2023
- 2022SoK: Let the Privacy Games Begin! A Unified Treatment of Data Inference Privacy in Machine Learning21 Dec 2022