mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Group privacy for personalized federated learning

arXiv 2206.03396 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) is a type of collaborative machine learning where participating peers/clients process their data locally, sharing only updates to the collaborative model. This enables to build privacy-aware distributed machine learning models, among others. The goal is the optimization of a statistical model's parameters by minimizing a cost function of a collection of datasets which are stored locally by a set of clients. This process exposes the clients to two issues: leakage of private information and lack of personalization of the model. On the other hand, with the recent advancements in various techniques to analyze data, there is a surge of concern for the privacy violation of the participating clients. To mitigate this, differential privacy and its variants serve as a standard for providing formal privacy guarantees. Often the clients represent very heterogeneous communities and hold data which are very diverse. Therefore, aligned with the recent focus of the FL community to build a framework of personalized models for the users representing their diversity, it is also of utmost importance to protect the clients' sensitive and personal information against potential threats. To address this goal we consider d-privacy, also known as metric privacy, which is a variant of local differential privacy, using a a metric-based obfuscation technique that preserves the topological distribution of the original data. To cope with the issue of protecting the privacy of the clients and allowing for personalized model training to enhance the fairness and utility of the system, we propose a method to provide group privacy guarantees exploiting some key properties of d-privacy which enables personalized models under the framework of FL. We provide theoretical justifications to the applicability and experimental validation on real datasets to illustrate the working of our method.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2022.

Builds on

38 of 74 references.

References · 38

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  3. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  4. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
  5. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
  6. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
  7. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
  8. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  9. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  10. 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 780
  11. 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 711
  12. 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 565
26 more
  1. 2016Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligencecited by 558
  2. 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 505
  3. 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 499
  4. 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
  5. 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 326
  6. 2020Three Approaches for Personalization with Applications to Federated Learningcited by 321
  7. 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 218
  8. 2016Practical Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning on User-Held Datacited by 178
  9. 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 163
  10. 2018cpSGD: Communication-efficient and differentially-private distributed SGDcited by 157
  11. 2020LDP-Fed: Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacycited by 129
  12. 2018Distributed Differential Privacy via Shufflingcited by 115
  13. 2020Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by Shufflingcited by 96
  14. 2020Local Differential Privacy based Federated Learning for Internet of Thingscited by 74
  15. 2019The Privacy Blanket of the Shuffle Modelcited by 73
  16. 2016Discrete Distribution Estimation under Local Privacycited by 58
  17. 2017Prochlo: Strong Privacy for Analytics in the Crowdcited by 51
  18. 2020Tight Differential Privacy for Discrete-Valued Mechanisms and for the Subsampled Gaussian Mechanism Using FFTcited by 43
  19. 2020Encode, Shuffle, Analyze Privacy Revisited: Formalizations and Empirical Evaluationcited by 39
  20. 2020Chasing Your Long Tails: Differentially Private Prediction in Health Care Settingscited by 37
  21. 2020Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle Modelcited by 34
  22. 2017Practical Locally Private Heavy Hitterscited by 28
  23. 2014Optimal Geo-Indistinguishable Mechanisms for Location Privacycited by 9
  24. 2021The Laplace Mechanism has optimal utility for differential privacy over continuous queriescited by 6
  25. 2021Tight Accounting in the Shuffle Model of Differential Privacycited by 5
  26. 2021Differentially Private Histograms in the Shuffle Model from Fake Userscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.