mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Different Faces of AI Ethics Across the World: A Principle-Implementation Gap Analysis

arXiv 2206.03225 ↗First posted 12 May 2022cs.CY cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming our daily life with several applications in healthcare, space exploration, banking and finance. These rapid progresses in AI have brought increasing attention to the potential impacts of AI technologies on society, with ethically questionable consequences. In recent years, several ethical principles have been released by governments, national and international organisations. These principles outline high-level precepts to guide the ethical development, deployment, and governance of AI. However, the abstract nature, diversity, and context-dependency of these principles make them difficult to implement and operationalize, resulting in gaps between principles and their execution. Most recent work analysed and summarized existing AI principles and guidelines but they did not provide findings on principle-implementation gaps and how to mitigate them. These findings are particularly important to ensure that AI implementations are aligned with ethical principles and values. In this paper, we provide a contextual and global evaluation of current ethical AI principles for all continents, with the aim to identify potential principle characteristics tailored to specific countries or applicable across countries. Next, we analyze the current level of AI readiness and current implementations of ethical AI principles in different countries, to identify gaps in the implementation of AI principles and their causes. Finally, we propose recommendations to mitigate the principle-implementation gaps.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 122 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2022.

Builds on

18 of 122 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  4. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  5. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  6. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  7. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
  8. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  9. 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 459
  10. 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 214
  11. 2019The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelinescited by 129
  12. 2016Technical Report on the CleverHans v2.1.0 Adversarial Examples Librarycited by 123
6 more
  1. 2019A Survey of Deep Learning Applications to Autonomous Vehicle Controlcited by 101
  2. 2016Towards the Science of Security and Privacy in Machine Learningcited by 89
  3. 2019Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safetycited by 68
  4. 2020Radioactive data: tracing through trainingcited by 67
  5. 2020The Problem with Metrics is a Fundamental Problem for AIcited by 37
  6. 2019Ethically Aligned Design of Autonomous Systems: Industry viewpoint and an empirical studycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.