mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AugLoss: A Robust Augmentation-based Fine Tuning Methodology

arXiv 2206.02286 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Learning (DL) models achieve great successes in many domains. However, DL models increasingly face safety and robustness concerns, including noisy labeling in the training stage and feature distribution shifts in the testing stage. Previous works made significant progress in addressing these problems, but the focus has largely been on developing solutions for only one problem at a time. For example, recent work has argued for the use of tunable robust loss functions to mitigate label noise, and data augmentation (e.g., AugMix) to combat distribution shifts. As a step towards addressing both problems simultaneously, we introduce AugLoss, a simple but effective methodology that achieves robustness against both train-time noisy labeling and test-time feature distribution shifts by unifying data augmentation and robust loss functions. We conduct comprehensive experiments in varied settings of real-world dataset corruption to showcase the gains achieved by AugLoss compared to previous state-of-the-art methods. Lastly, we hope this work will open new directions for designing more robust and reliable DL models under real-world corruptions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2022.

Builds on

31 of 43 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  3. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  4. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  6. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  7. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  8. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
  9. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  10. 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
  11. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  12. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
19 more
  1. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  2. 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 766
  3. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 730
  4. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  5. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  6. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  7. 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 357
  8. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  9. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
  10. 2020Adversarial Robustness: From Self-Supervised Pre-Training to Fine-Tuningcited by 153
  11. 2020Robust Pre-Training by Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 144
  12. 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
  13. 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
  14. 2021AugMax: Adversarial Composition of Random Augmentations for Robust Trainingcited by 90
  15. 2022PolyLoss: A Polynomial Expansion Perspective of Classification Loss Functionscited by 63
  16. 2021Asymmetric Loss Functions for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 46
  17. 2019A Tunable Loss Function for Robust Classification: Calibration, Landscape, and Generalizationcited by 23
  18. 2020On Focal Loss for Class-Posterior Probability Estimation: A Theoretical Perspectivecited by 21
  19. 2021Being Properly Impropercited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.