mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Measuring Gender Bias in Word Embeddings of Gendered Languages Requires Disentangling Grammatical Gender Signals

arXiv 2206.01691 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2022cs.CY cs.AI cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Does the grammatical gender of a language interfere when measuring the semantic gender information captured by its word embeddings? A number of anomalous gender bias measurements in the embeddings of gendered languages suggest this possibility. We demonstrate that word embeddings learn the association between a noun and its grammatical gender in grammatically gendered languages, which can skew social gender bias measurements. Consequently, word embedding post-processing methods are introduced to quantify, disentangle, and evaluate grammatical gender signals. The evaluation is performed on five gendered languages from the Germanic, Romance, and Slavic branches of the Indo-European language family. Our method reduces the strength of grammatical gender signals, which is measured in terms of effect size (Cohen's d), by a significant average of d = 1.3 for French, German, and Italian, and d = 0.56 for Polish and Spanish. Once grammatical gender is disentangled, the association between over 90% of 10,000 inanimate nouns and their assigned grammatical gender weakens, and cross-lingual bias results from the Word Embedding Association Test (WEAT) become more congruent with country-level implicit bias measurements. The results further suggest that disentangling grammatical gender signals from word embeddings may lead to improvement in semantic machine learning tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2022.

Builds on

18 of 65 references.

References · 18

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  2. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  4. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
  5. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
  6. 2016Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translationcited by 469
  7. 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
  8. 2018Learning Word Vectors for 157 Languagescited by 280
  9. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 253
  10. 2019Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphologycited by 200
  11. 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 172
  12. 2019Understanding Undesirable Word Embedding Associationscited by 59
6 more
  1. 2020Gender Bias in Multilingual Embeddings and Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 55
  2. 2019Examining Gender Bias in Languages with Grammatical Gendercited by 40
  3. 2019Are We Consistently Biased? Multidimensional Analysis of Biases in Distributional Word Vectorscited by 31
  4. 2020ValNorm Quantifies Semantics to Reveal Consistent Valence Biases Across Languages and Over Centuriescited by 15
  5. 2019How does Grammatical Gender Affect Noun Representations in Gender-Marking Languages?cited by 14
  6. 2020Grammatical gender associations outweigh topical gender bias in crosslinguistic word embeddingscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.