mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Incorporating Explicit Uncertainty Estimates into Deep Offline Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2206.01085 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2022cs.LGcited by 4

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Offline RL algorithms

Abstract (arXiv)

Most theoretically motivated work in the offline reinforcement learning setting requires precise uncertainty estimates. This requirement restricts the algorithms derived in that work to the tabular and linear settings where such estimates exist. In this work, we develop a novel method for incorporating scalable uncertainty estimates into an offline reinforcement learning algorithm called deep-SPIBB that extends the SPIBB family of algorithms to environments with larger state and action spaces. We use recent innovations in uncertainty estimation from the deep learning community to get more scalable uncertainty estimates to plug into deep-SPIBB. While these uncertainty estimates do not allow for the same theoretical guarantees as in the tabular case, we argue that the SPIBB mechanism for incorporating uncertainty is more robust and flexible than pessimistic approaches that incorporate the uncertainty as a value function penalty. We bear this out empirically, showing that deep-SPIBB outperforms pessimism based approaches with access to the same uncertainty estimates and performs at least on par with a variety of other strong baselines across several environments and datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Offline RL algorithms, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 36 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2022.

Builds on

36 of 57 references.

Closest ancestors · 20

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021RvS: What is Essential for Offline RL via Supervised Learning?20 Dec
  2. 2021Towards Hyperparameter-free Policy Selection for Offline Reinforcement Learning26 Oct
  3. 2021Towards Instance-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pessimism17 Oct
  4. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learning12 Oct
  5. 2021Offline RL Without Off-Policy Evaluation16 Jun
  6. 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learning12 Jun
  7. 2021Regularized Behavior Value Estimation17 Mar
  8. 2021COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimization16 Feb
  9. 2021Near-Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning via Double Variance Reduction2 Feb
  10. 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?30 Dec
  11. 2020Hyperparameter Selection for Offline Reinforcement Learning17 Jul
  12. 2020Provably Good Batch Reinforcement Learning Without Great Exploration16 Jul
8 more
  1. 2020Critic Regularized Regression26 Jun
  2. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning8 Jun
  3. 2020MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimization27 May
  4. 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning12 May
  5. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems4 May
  6. 2020Keep Doing What Worked: Behavioral Modelling Priors for Offline Reinforcement Learning19 Feb
  7. 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learning26 Nov
  8. 2019Benchmarking Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms3 Oct

Other references · 16

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  3. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,546
  4. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,241
  5. 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 993
  6. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning as One Big Sequence Modeling Problemcited by 644
  7. 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 474
  8. 2017Count-Based Exploration with Neural Density Modelscited by 257
  9. 2018Randomized Prior Functions for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 219
  10. 2020Acme: A Research Framework for Distributed Reinforcement Learningcited by 146
  11. 2017Safe Policy Improvement with Baseline Bootstrappingcited by 144
  12. 2019Behaviour Suite for Reinforcement Learningcited by 132
4 more
  1. 2021Epistemic Neural Networkscited by 120
  2. 2020The Importance of Pessimism in Fixed-Dataset Policy Optimizationcited by 99
  3. 2016Safe Policy Improvement by Minimizing Robust Baseline Regretcited by 53
  4. 2019Safe Policy Improvement with Soft Baseline Bootstrappingcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Fighting Uncertainty with Gradients: Offline Reinforcement Learning via Diffusion Score Matching
  2. 2022Pessimistic Bootstrapping for Uncertainty-Driven Offline Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2024SUMO: Search-Based Uncertainty Estimation for Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2024Deterministic Uncertainty Propagation for Improved Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2023A Simple Unified Uncertainty-Guided Framework for Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2021Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-Ensemble
  7. 2023Selective Uncertainty Propagation in Offline RL
  8. 2026Epistemic Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning