mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Contrasting quadratic assignments for set-based representation learning

arXiv 2205.15814 ↗First posted 31 May 2022cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The standard approach to contrastive learning is to maximize the agreement between different views of the data. The views are ordered in pairs, such that they are either positive, encoding different views of the same object, or negative, corresponding to views of different objects. The supervisory signal comes from maximizing the total similarity over positive pairs, while the negative pairs are needed to avoid collapse. In this work, we note that the approach of considering individual pairs cannot account for both intra-set and inter-set similarities when the sets are formed from the views of the data. It thus limits the information content of the supervisory signal available to train representations. We propose to go beyond contrasting individual pairs of objects by focusing on contrasting objects as sets. For this, we use combinatorial quadratic assignment theory designed to evaluate set and graph similarities and derive set-contrastive objective as a regularizer for contrastive learning methods. We conduct experiments and demonstrate that our method improves learned representations for the tasks of metric learning and self-supervised classification.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2022.

Builds on

32 of 51 references.

References · 32

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  5. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  7. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  8. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  9. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  10. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  11. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  12. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
20 more
  1. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  2. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,591
  3. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,405
  4. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
  5. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,273
  6. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  7. 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 808
  8. 2017In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identificationcited by 786
  9. 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 554
  10. 2020Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 512
  11. 2016From Softmax to Sparsemax: A Sparse Model of Attention and Multi-Label Classificationcited by 341
  12. 2019On Mutual Information Maximization for Representation Learningcited by 316
  13. 2020Whitening for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 279
  14. 2019Revisiting Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 251
  15. 2020Intriguing Properties of Contrastive Lossescited by 130
  16. 2019Learning with Fenchel-Young Lossescited by 119
  17. 2020Boosting Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning with False Negative Cancellationcited by 119
  18. 2018SparseMAP: Differentiable Sparse Structured Inferencecited by 62
  19. 2020Self-Supervised Relational Reasoning for Representation Learningcited by 37
  20. 2018Learning Classifiers with Fenchel-Young Losses: Generalized Entropies, Margins, and Algorithmscited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

6 papers.