mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TAR: Neural Logical Reasoning across TBox and ABox

arXiv 2205.14591 ↗First posted 29 May 2022cs.AI cs.LG cs.LOcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Many ontologies, i.e., Description Logic (DL) knowledge bases, have been developed to provide rich knowledge about various domains. An ontology consists of an ABox, i.e., assertion axioms between two entities or between a concept and an entity, and a TBox, i.e., terminology axioms between two concepts. Neural logical reasoning (NLR) is a fundamental task to explore such knowledge bases, which aims at answering multi-hop queries with logical operations based on distributed representations of queries and answers. While previous NLR methods can give specific entity-level answers, i.e., ABox answers, they are not able to provide descriptive concept-level answers, i.e., TBox answers, where each concept is a description of a set of entities. In other words, previous NLR methods only reason over the ABox of an ontology while ignoring the TBox. In particular, providing TBox answers enables inferring the explanations of each query with descriptive concepts, which make answers comprehensible to users and are of great usefulness in the field of applied ontology. In this work, we formulate the problem of neural logical reasoning across TBox and ABox (TA-NLR), solving which needs to address challenges in incorporating, representing, and operating on concepts. We propose an original solution named TAR for TA-NLR. Firstly, we incorporate description logic based ontological axioms to provide the source of concepts. Then, we represent concepts and queries as fuzzy sets, i.e., sets whose elements have degrees of membership, to bridge concepts and queries with entities. Moreover, we design operators involving concepts on top of fuzzy set representation of concepts and queries for optimization and inference. Extensive experimental results on two real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of TAR for TA-NLR.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2022.

Builds on

17 of 47 references.

References · 17

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020Query2box: Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs in Vector Space using Box Embeddingscited by 169
  3. 2020Beta Embeddings for Multi-Hop Logical Reasoning in Knowledge Graphscited by 128
  4. 2020Improving Conversational Recommender Systems via Knowledge Graph based Semantic Fusioncited by 122
  5. 2018Embedding Logical Queries on Knowledge Graphscited by 120
  6. 2020Complex Query Answering with Neural Link Predictorscited by 98
  7. 2021ConE: Cone Embeddings for Multi-Hop Reasoning over Knowledge Graphscited by 78
  8. 2022Neural-Symbolic Models for Logical Queries on Knowledge Graphscited by 60
  9. 2019EL Embeddings: Geometric construction of models for the Description Logic EL ++cited by 48
  10. 2021Universal Representation Learning of Knowledge Bases by Jointly Embedding Instances and Ontological Conceptscited by 37
  11. 2020Self-Supervised Hyperboloid Representations from Logical Queries over Knowledge Graphscited by 35
  12. 2018OPA2Vec: combining formal and informal content of biomedical ontologies to improve similarity-based predictioncited by 25
5 more
  1. 2021Logic Embeddings for Complex Query Answeringcited by 17
  2. 2020Analyzing Differentiable Fuzzy Implicationscited by 15
  3. 2022Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Adversarial Data Augmentation for Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 13
  4. 2021Fuzzy Logic Based Logical Query Answering on Knowledge Graphscited by 11
  5. 2021Bio-JOIE: Joint Representation Learning of Biological Knowledge Basescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Neuro-Symbolic RDF and Description Logic Reasoners: The State-Of-The-Art and Challenges
  2. 2022Neural Methods for Logical Reasoning Over Knowledge Graphs
  3. 2026To Neuro-Symbolic Classification and Beyond by Compiling Description Logic Ontologies to Probabilistic Circuits
  4. 2026NeurOWL: An LLM-Based Neural-symbolic Framework for Incomplete OWL Ontology Reasoning
  5. 2024Transformer-based Language Models for Reasoning in the Description Logic ALCQ
  6. 2023Logical Reasoning over Natural Language as Knowledge Representation: A Survey
  7. 2026OrLog: Resolving Complex Queries with LLMs and Probabilistic Reasoning
  8. 2025From Query to Logic: Ontology-Driven Multi-Hop Reasoning in LLMs