mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Benchmark and Asymmetrical-Similarity Learning for Practical Image Copy Detection

arXiv 2205.12358 ↗First posted 24 May 2022cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image copy detection (ICD) aims to determine whether a query image is an edited copy of any image from a reference set. Currently, there are very limited public benchmarks for ICD, while all overlook a critical challenge in real-world applications, i.e., the distraction from hard negative queries. Specifically, some queries are not edited copies but are inherently similar to some reference images. These hard negative queries are easily false recognized as edited copies, significantly compromising the ICD accuracy. This observation motivates us to build the first ICD benchmark featuring this characteristic. Based on existing ICD datasets, this paper constructs a new dataset by additionally adding 100, 000 and 24, 252 hard negative pairs into the training and test set, respectively. Moreover, this paper further reveals a unique difficulty for solving the hard negative problem in ICD, i.e., there is a fundamental conflict between current metric learning and ICD. This conflict is: the metric learning adopts symmetric distance while the edited copy is an asymmetric (unidirectional) process, e.g., a partial crop is close to its holistic reference image and is an edited copy, while the latter cannot be the edited copy of the former (in spite the distance is equally small). This insight results in an Asymmetrical-Similarity Learning (ASL) method, which allows the similarity in two directions (the query <-> the reference image) to be different from each other. Experimental results show that ASL outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a clear margin, confirming that solving the symmetric-asymmetric conflict is critical for ICD. The NDEC dataset and code are available at https://github.com/WangWenhao0716/ASL.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2022.

Builds on

16 of 29 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  2. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  3. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  4. 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 968
  5. 2017In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identificationcited by 784
  6. 2020Circle Loss: A Unified Perspective of Pair Similarity Optimizationcited by 402
  7. 2021MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessmentcited by 332
  8. 2016Large-Margin Softmax Loss for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 296
  9. 2022A Self-Supervised Descriptor for Image Copy Detectioncited by 175
  10. 2019MultiGrain: a unified image embedding for classes and instancescited by 85
  11. 2021The 2021 Image Similarity Dataset and Challengecited by 44
  12. 2021Contrastive Learning with Large Memory Bank and Negative Embedding Subtraction for Accurate Copy Detectioncited by 23
4 more
  1. 2021Bag of Tricks and A Strong baseline for Image Copy Detectioncited by 14
  2. 2021D2LV: A Data-Driven and Local-Verification Approach for Image Copy Detectioncited by 7
  3. 2021Producing augmentation-invariant embeddings from real-life imagerycited by 6
  4. 20213rd Place: A Global and Local Dual Retrieval Solution to Facebook AI Image Similarity Challengecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

9 papers.