mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Richer Countries and Richer Representations

arXiv 2205.05093 ↗First posted 10 May 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We examine whether some countries are more richly represented in embedding space than others. We find that countries whose names occur with low frequency in training corpora are more likely to be tokenized into subwords, are less semantically distinct in embedding space, and are less likely to be correctly predicted: e.g., Ghana (the correct answer and in-vocabulary) is not predicted for, "The country producing the most cocoa is [MASK].". Although these performance discrepancies and representational harms are due to frequency, we find that frequency is highly correlated with a country's GDP; thus perpetuating historic power and wealth inequalities. We analyze the effectiveness of mitigation strategies; recommend that researchers report training word frequencies; and recommend future work for the community to define and design representational guarantees.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2022.

Builds on

22 of 35 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  4. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  5. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  6. 2015Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Bookscited by 1,041
  7. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  8. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
  9. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  10. 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 376
  11. 2018WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representationscited by 370
  12. 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
10 more
  1. 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214
  2. 2020Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilitiescited by 182
  3. 2020Hurtful Words: Quantifying Biases in Clinical Contextual Word Embeddingscited by 79
  4. 2017Racial Disparity in Natural Language Processing: A Case Study of Social Media African-American Englishcited by 69
  5. 2020Moving Down the Long Tail of Word Sense Disambiguation with Gloss-Informed Biencoderscited by 61
  6. 2019Understanding Undesirable Word Embedding Associationscited by 59
  7. 2018Towards Understanding Linear Word Analogiescited by 57
  8. 2020"You are grounded!": Latent Name Artifacts in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 39
  9. 2021Low Frequency Names Exhibit Bias and Overfitting in Contextualizing Language Modelscited by 39
  10. 2020Utility is in the Eye of the User: A Critique of NLP Leaderboardscited by 28

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.