mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Controlling Extra-Textual Attributes about Dialogue Participants -- A Case Study of English-to-Polish Neural Machine Translation

arXiv 2205.04747 ↗First posted 10 May 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unlike English, morphologically rich languages can reveal characteristics of speakers or their conversational partners, such as gender and number, via pronouns, morphological endings of words and syntax. When translating from English to such languages, a machine translation model needs to opt for a certain interpretation of textual context, which may lead to serious translation errors if extra-textual information is unavailable. We investigate this challenge in the English-to-Polish language direction. We focus on the underresearched problem of utilising external metadata in automatic translation of TV dialogue, proposing a case study where a wide range of approaches for controlling attributes in translation is employed in a multi-attribute scenario. The best model achieves an improvement of +5.81 chrF++/+6.03 BLEU, with other models achieving competitive performance. We additionally contribute a novel attribute-annotated dataset of Polish TV dialogue and a morphological analysis script used to evaluate attribute control in models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2022.

Builds on

19 of 58 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  4. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  5. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
  6. 2016Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translationcited by 467
  7. 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 166
  8. 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 116
  9. 2019Getting Gender Right in Neural Machine Translationcited by 98
  10. 2019Style Transformer: Unpaired Text Style Transfer without Disentangled Latent Representationcited by 84
  11. 2016Personalized Machine Translation: Preserving Original Author Traitscited by 47
  12. 2019Controlling the Output Length of Neural Machine Translationcited by 36
7 more
  1. 2020Automatically Identifying Gender Issues in Machine Translation using Perturbationscited by 28
  2. 2018Extreme Adaptation for Personalized Neural Machine Translationcited by 27
  3. 2019Filling Gender & Number Gaps in Neural Machine Translation with Black-box Context Injectioncited by 27
  4. 2018Gender Aware Spoken Language Translation Applied to English-Arabiccited by 18
  5. 2019Controlling Neural Machine Translation Formality with Synthetic Supervisioncited by 18
  6. 2021Machine Translation Verbosity Control for Automatic Dubbingcited by 18
  7. 2021Encouraging Neural Machine Translation to Satisfy Terminology Constraintscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

3 papers.