Counterfactually Augmented Data and Unintended Bias: The Case of Sexism and Hate Speech Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactually Augmented Data (CAD) aims to improve out-of-domain generalizability, an indicator of model robustness. The improvement is credited with promoting core features of the construct over spurious artifacts that happen to correlate with it. Yet, over-relying on core features may lead to unintended model bias. Especially, construct-driven CAD -- perturbations of core features -- may induce models to ignore the context in which core features are used. Here, we test models for sexism and hate speech detection on challenging data: non-hateful and non-sexist usage of identity and gendered terms. In these hard cases, models trained on CAD, especially construct-driven CAD, show higher false-positive rates than models trained on the original, unperturbed data. Using a diverse set of CAD -- construct-driven and construct-agnostic -- reduces such unintended bias.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2022.
Builds on
18 of 36 references.
References · 18
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
- 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
- 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 428
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
- 2021Polyjuice: Generating Counterfactuals for Explaining, Evaluating, and Improving Modelscited by 219
- 2020Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detectioncited by 217
- 2020HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 215
- 2021Causal Inference in Natural Language Processing: Estimation, Prediction, Interpretation and Beyondcited by 177
- 2019Build it Break it Fix it for Dialogue Safety: Robustness from Adversarial Human Attackcited by 176
- 2020Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanationcited by 84
- 2020Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionatelycited by 52
6 more
- 2019A Just and Comprehensive Strategy for Using NLP to Address Online Abusecited by 49
- 2020"Call me sexist, but...": Revisiting Sexism Detection Using Psychological Scales and Adversarial Samplescited by 48
- 2021Causal Direction of Data Collection Matters: Implications of Causal and Anticausal Learning for NLPcited by 21
- 2021How Does Counterfactually Augmented Data Impact Models for Social Computing Constructs?cited by 19
- 2022Fact Checking with Insufficient Evidencecited by 11
- 2021Text as Causal Mediators: Research Design for Causal Estimates of Differential Treatment of Social Groups via Language Aspectscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2024A Survey on Multilingual Large Language Models: Corpora, Alignment, and Biascited by 82
- 2022Perturbation Augmentation for Fairer NLPcited by 51
- 2022Probing Classifiers are Unreliable for Concept Removal and Detectioncited by 40
- 2024Hate Speech Detection with Generalizable Target-aware Fairnesscited by 7
- 2023Hate Speech Detection via Dual Contrastive Learningcited by 3
- 2023Unlock the Potential of Counterfactually-Augmented Data in Out-Of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 2
- 2024Divided by discipline? A systematic literature review on the quantification of online sexism and misogyny using a semi-automated approachcited by 2
- 2023Causal Effect Regularization: Automated Detection and Removal of Spurious Attributescited by 1
- 2023On the Challenges of Building Datasets for Hate Speech Detectioncited by 0
- 2024NLPGuard: A Framework for Mitigating the Use of Protected Attributes by NLP Classifierscited by 0
- 2026Training-Time Explainability for Multilingual Hate Speech Detection: Aligning Model Reasoning with Human Rationalescited by 0
- 2026Training-Time Explainability for Multilingual Hate Speech Detection: Aligning Model Reasoning with Human Rationales22 Jun 2026
- 2024Divided by discipline? A systematic literature review on the quantification of online sexism and misogyny using a semi-automated approach30 Sep 2024
- 2024NLPGuard: A Framework for Mitigating the Use of Protected Attributes by NLP Classifiers1 Jul 2024
- 2024Hate Speech Detection with Generalizable Target-aware Fairness28 May 2024
- 2024A Survey on Multilingual Large Language Models: Corpora, Alignment, and Bias1 Apr 2024
- 2023Unlock the Potential of Counterfactually-Augmented Data in Out-Of-Distribution Generalization10 Oct 2023
- 2023On the Challenges of Building Datasets for Hate Speech Detection6 Sep 2023
- 2023Hate Speech Detection via Dual Contrastive Learning10 Jul 2023
- 2023Causal Effect Regularization: Automated Detection and Removal of Spurious Attributes19 Jun 2023
- 2022Probing Classifiers are Unreliable for Concept Removal and Detection8 Jul 2022
- 2022Perturbation Augmentation for Fairer NLP25 May 2022