Unlock the Potential of Counterfactually-Augmented Data in Out-Of-Distribution Generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactually-Augmented Data (CAD) -- minimal editing of sentences to flip the corresponding labels -- has the potential to improve the Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) generalization capability of language models, as CAD induces language models to exploit domain-independent causal features and exclude spurious correlations. However, the empirical results of CAD's OOD generalization are not as efficient as anticipated. In this study, we attribute the inefficiency to the myopia phenomenon caused by CAD: language models only focus on causal features that are edited in the augmentation operation and exclude other non-edited causal features. Therefore, the potential of CAD is not fully exploited. To address this issue, we analyze the myopia phenomenon in feature space from the perspective of Fisher's Linear Discriminant, then we introduce two additional constraints based on CAD's structural properties (dataset-level and sentence-level) to help language models extract more complete causal features in CAD, thereby mitigating the myopia phenomenon and improving OOD generalization capability. We evaluate our method on two tasks: Sentiment Analysis and Natural Language Inference, and the experimental results demonstrate that our method could unlock the potential of CAD and improve the OOD generalization performance of language models by 1.0% to 5.9%.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2023.
Builds on
37 of 69 references.
References · 37
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
- 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 766
- 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 439
25 more
- 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 436
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 351
- 2020The Risks of Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 262
- 2018Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processingcited by 211
- 2020A Survey on Causal Inferencecited by 202
- 2019Counterfactual Data Augmentation for Mitigating Gender Stereotypes in Languages with Rich Morphologycited by 200
- 2021A Fine-Grained Analysis on Distribution Shiftcited by 171
- 2020Understanding the Failure Modes of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 146
- 2020Efficient Domain Generalization via Common-Specific Low-Rank Decompositioncited by 134
- 2020CausaLM: Causal Model Explanation Through Counterfactual Language Modelscited by 117
- 2019DIVA: Domain Invariant Variational Autoencoderscited by 115
- 2021A Survey on Data Augmentation for Text Classificationcited by 111
- 2020SSMBA: Self-Supervised Manifold Based Data Augmentation for Improving Out-of-Domain Robustnesscited by 96
- 2020Robustness to Spurious Correlations in Text Classification via Automatically Generated Counterfactualscited by 67
- 2021AEDA: An Easier Data Augmentation Technique for Text Classificationcited by 67
- 2020Learning What Makes a Difference from Counterfactual Examples and Gradient Supervisioncited by 66
- 2020Identifying Spurious Correlations for Robust Text Classificationcited by 59
- 2021An Investigation of the (In)effectiveness of Counterfactually Augmented Datacited by 42
- 2019Transfer Learning with Dynamic Distribution Adaptationcited by 40
- 2021Exploring the Efficacy of Automatically Generated Counterfactuals for Sentiment Analysiscited by 30
- 2022DISCO: Distilling Counterfactuals with Large Language Modelscited by 30
- 2020Counterfactually-Augmented SNLI Training Data Does Not Yield Better Generalization Than Unaugmented Datacited by 27
- 2018Explicit Interaction Model towards Text Classificationcited by 16
- 2022Counterfactually Augmented Data and Unintended Bias: The Case of Sexism and Hate Speech Detectioncited by 11
- 2021Transfer Learning and Augmentation for Word Sense Disambiguationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.