mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automatic Detection of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections in Solar Wind In Situ Data

arXiv 2205.03578 ↗First posted 7 May 2022astro-ph.SR astro-ph.IM cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) are one of the main drivers for space weather disturbances. In the past, different approaches have been used to automatically detect events in existing time series resulting from solar wind in situ observations. However, accurate and fast detection still remains a challenge when facing the large amount of data from different instruments. For the automatic detection of ICMEs we propose a pipeline using a method that has recently proven successful in medical image segmentation. Comparing it to an existing method, we find that while achieving similar results, our model outperforms the baseline regarding training time by a factor of approximately 20, thus making it more applicable for other datasets. The method has been tested on in situ data from the Wind spacecraft between 1997 and 2015 with a True Skill Statistic (TSS) of 0.64. Out of the 640 ICMEs, 466 were detected correctly by our algorithm, producing a total of 254 False Positives. Additionally, it produced reasonable results on datasets with fewer features and smaller training sets from Wind, STEREO-A and STEREO-B with True Skill Statistics of 0.56, 0.57 and 0.53, respectively. Our pipeline manages to find the start of an ICME with a mean absolute error (MAE) of around 2 hours and 56 minutes, and the end time with a MAE of 3 hours and 20 minutes. The relatively fast training allows straightforward tuning of hyperparameters and could therefore easily be used to detect other structures and phenomena in solar wind data, such as corotating interaction regions.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2022.

Builds on

13 of 39 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  5. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  6. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  7. 2014Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognitioncited by 719
  8. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
  9. 2017Road Extraction by Deep Residual U-Netcited by 333
  10. 2020A survey of loss functions for semantic segmentationcited by 216
  11. 2019ResUNet++: An Advanced Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 211
  12. 2019U-Time: A Fully Convolutional Network for Time Series Segmentation Applied to Sleep Stagingcited by 87
1 more
  1. 2020Simultaneously forecasting global geomagnetic activity using Recurrent Networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.