mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Processing Network Controls via Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2205.02119 ↗First posted 1 May 2022math.OC cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Novel advanced policy gradient (APG) algorithms, such as proximal policy optimization (PPO), trust region policy optimization, and their variations, have become the dominant reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms because of their ease of implementation and good practical performance. This dissertation is concerned with theoretical justification and practical application of the APG algorithms for solving processing network control optimization problems. Processing network control problems are typically formulated as Markov decision process (MDP) or semi-Markov decision process (SMDP) problems that have several unconventional for RL features: infinite state spaces, unbounded costs, long-run average cost objectives. Policy improvement bounds play a crucial role in the theoretical justification of the APG algorithms. In this thesis we refine existing bounds for MDPs with finite state spaces and prove novel policy improvement bounds for classes of MDPs and SMDPs used to model processing network operations. We consider two examples of processing network control problems and customize the PPO algorithm to solve them. First, we consider parallel-server and multiclass queueing networks controls. Second, we consider the drivers repositioning problem in a ride-hailing service system. For both examples the PPO algorithm with auxiliary modifications consistently generates control policies that outperform state-of-art heuristics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 142 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2022.

Builds on

27 of 142 references.

References · 27

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  4. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  5. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  6. 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,097
  7. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
  8. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  9. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
  10. 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 699
  11. 2017Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applicationscited by 516
  12. 2018Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisationcited by 318
15 more
  1. 2016Sample Efficient Actor-Critic with Experience Replaycited by 185
  2. 2018Applications of Deep Reinforcement Learning in Communications and Networking: A Surveycited by 163
  3. 2017Scalable trust-region method for deep reinforcement learning using Kronecker-factored approximationcited by 119
  4. 2016Entity Embeddings of Categorical Variablescited by 85
  5. 2020Reinforcement Learning for Molecular Design Guided by Quantum Mechanicscited by 51
  6. 2021A Deep Value-network Based Approach for Multi-Driver Order Dispatchingcited by 45
  7. 2019Trust Region-Guided Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 36
  8. 2021Reinforcement Learning for Ridesharing: An Extended Surveycited by 35
  9. 2021On-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Average-Reward Criterioncited by 29
  10. 2018MOVI: A Model-Free Approach to Dynamic Fleet Managementcited by 23
  11. 2014Linear Programming for Large-Scale Markov Decision Problemscited by 12
  12. 2018A Closer Look at Deep Policy Gradientscited by 12
  13. 2020Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Ride-Hailingcited by 12
  14. 2019Optimizing Online Matching for Ride-Sourcing Services with Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
  15. 2021Refined Policy Improvement Bounds for MDPscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.