mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding CNNs from excitations

arXiv 2205.00932 ↗First posted 2 May 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Saliency maps have proven to be a highly efficacious approach for explicating the decisions of Convolutional Neural Networks. However, extant methodologies predominantly rely on gradients, which constrain their ability to explicate complex models. Furthermore, such approaches are not fully adept at leveraging negative gradient information to improve interpretive veracity. In this study, we present a novel concept, termed positive and negative excitation, which enables the direct extraction of positive and negative excitation for each layer, thus enabling complete layer-by-layer information utilization sans gradients. To organize these excitations into final saliency maps, we introduce a double-chain backpropagation procedure. A comprehensive experimental evaluation, encompassing both binary classification and multi-classification tasks, was conducted to gauge the effectiveness of our proposed method. Encouragingly, the results evince that our approach offers a significant improvement over the state-of-the-art methods in terms of salient pixel removal, minor pixel removal, and inconspicuous adversarial perturbation generation guidance. Additionally, we verify the correlation between positive and negative excitations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2022.

Builds on

25 of 43 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  4. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  5. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  6. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  7. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  8. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  9. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  10. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  11. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  12. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
13 more
  1. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  2. 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
  3. 2019Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualizationcited by 189
  4. 2014Object Detectors Emerge in Deep Scene CNNscited by 178
  5. 2020Axiom-based Grad-CAM: Towards Accurate Visualization and Explanation of CNNscited by 151
  6. 2018Explaining Image Classifiers by Counterfactual Generationcited by 144
  7. 2021Involution: Inverting the Inherence of Convolution for Visual Recognitioncited by 99
  8. 2019Interpretable and Fine-Grained Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 49
  9. 2021Towards Better Explanations of Class Activation Mappingcited by 47
  10. 2019Why are Saliency Maps Noisy? Cause of and Solution to Noisy Saliency Mapscited by 34
  11. 2016Gradients of Counterfactualscited by 31
  12. 2021F-CAM: Full Resolution Class Activation Maps via Guided Parametric Upscalingcited by 26
  13. 2019Explaining image classifiers by removing input features using generative modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.