mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Resource-efficient domain adaptive pre-training for medical images

arXiv 2204.13280 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2022eess.IV cs.CV cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The deep learning-based analysis of medical images suffers from data scarcity because of high annotation costs and privacy concerns. Researchers in this domain have used transfer learning to avoid overfitting when using complex architectures. However, the domain differences between pre-training and downstream data hamper the performance of the downstream task. Some recent studies have successfully used domain-adaptive pre-training (DAPT) to address this issue. In DAPT, models are initialized with the generic dataset pre-trained weights, and further pre-training is performed using a moderately sized in-domain dataset (medical images). Although this technique achieved good results for the downstream tasks in terms of accuracy and robustness, it is computationally expensive even when the datasets for DAPT are moderately sized. These compute-intensive techniques and models impact the environment negatively and create an uneven playing field for researchers with limited resources. This study proposed computationally efficient DAPT without compromising the downstream accuracy and robustness. This study proposes three techniques for this purpose, where the first (partial DAPT) performs DAPT on a subset of layers. The second one adopts a hybrid strategy (hybrid DAPT) by performing partial DAPT for a few epochs and then full DAPT for the remaining epochs. The third technique performs DAPT on simplified variants of the base architecture. The results showed that compared to the standard DAPT (full DAPT), the hybrid DAPT technique achieved better performance on the development and external datasets. In contrast, simplified architectures (after DAPT) achieved the best robustness while achieving modest performance on the development dataset .

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2022.

Builds on

20 of 38 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  3. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  4. 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 567
  5. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 511
  6. 2018A Survey on Deep Transfer Learningcited by 419
  7. 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 368
  8. 2021Big Self-Supervised Models Advance Medical Image Classificationcited by 320
  9. 2019Med3D: Transfer Learning for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 288
  10. 2021Pruning and Quantization for Deep Neural Network Acceleration: A Surveycited by 263
  11. 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 221
  12. 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learningcited by 209
8 more
  1. 2022The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrinkcited by 184
  2. 20203D Self-Supervised Methods for Medical Imagingcited by 134
  3. 2021Self-Supervised Pretraining Improves Self-Supervised Pretrainingcited by 82
  4. 2021Transferable Visual Words: Exploiting the Semantics of Anatomical Patterns for Self-supervised Learningcited by 68
  5. 2021A Winning Hand: Compressing Deep Networks Can Improve Out-Of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 62
  6. 2021A Systematic Benchmarking Analysis of Transfer Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 31
  7. 2020Joint Liver Lesion Segmentation and Classification via Transfer Learningcited by 14
  8. 2020Hide-and-Seek Privacy Challengecited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.