mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adversarial Fine-tune with Dynamically Regulated Adversary

arXiv 2204.13232 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial training is an effective method to boost model robustness to malicious, adversarial attacks. However, such improvement in model robustness often leads to a significant sacrifice of standard performance on clean images. In many real-world applications such as health diagnosis and autonomous surgical robotics, the standard performance is more valued over model robustness against such extremely malicious attacks. This leads to the question: To what extent we can boost model robustness without sacrificing standard performance? This work tackles this problem and proposes a simple yet effective transfer learning-based adversarial training strategy that disentangles the negative effects of adversarial samples on model's standard performance. In addition, we introduce a training-friendly adversarial attack algorithm, which facilitates the boost of adversarial robustness without introducing significant training complexity. Extensive experimentation indicates that the proposed method outperforms previous adversarial training algorithms towards the target: to improve model robustness while preserving model's standard performance on clean data.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2022.

Builds on

28 of 31 references.

References · 28

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  5. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  6. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  7. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,379
  8. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  9. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  10. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  11. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  12. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
16 more
  1. 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 530
  2. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  3. 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
  4. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  5. 2019Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognitioncited by 283
  6. 2018Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalizationcited by 171
  7. 2020Adversarial Robustness: From Self-Supervised Pre-Training to Fine-Tuningcited by 152
  8. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
  9. 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 131
  10. 2018Adversarial vulnerability for any classifiercited by 78
  11. 2015Learning with a Strong Adversarycited by 68
  12. 2020CAT: Customized Adversarial Training for Improved Robustnesscited by 61
  13. 2019Instance adaptive adversarial training: Improved accuracy tradeoffs in neural netscited by 55
  14. 2019Selfie: Self-supervised Pretraining for Image Embeddingcited by 46
  15. 2020Universal Adversarial Attack on Attention and the Resulting Dataset DAmageNetcited by 45
  16. 2020A Simple Fine-tuning Is All You Need: Towards Robust Deep Learning Via Adversarial Fine-tuningcited by 30

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

2 papers.