mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Influence of the Other-Race Effect on Susceptibility to Face Morphing Attacks

arXiv 2204.12591 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2022cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Facial morphs created between two identities resemble both of the faces used to create the morph. Consequently, humans and machines are prone to mistake morphs made from two identities for either of the faces used to create the morph. This vulnerability has been exploited in "morph attacks" in security scenarios. Here, we asked whether the "other-race effect" (ORE) -- the human advantage for identifying own- vs. other-race faces -- exacerbates morph attack susceptibility for humans. We also asked whether face-identification performance in a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) is affected by the race of morphed faces. Caucasian (CA) and East-Asian (EA) participants performed a face-identity matching task on pairs of CA and EA face images in two conditions. In the morph condition, different-identity pairs consisted of an image of identity "A" and a 50/50 morph between images of identity "A" and "B". In the baseline condition, morphs of different identities never appeared. As expected, morphs were identified mistakenly more often than original face images. Moreover, CA participants showed an advantage for CA faces in comparison to EA faces (a partial ORE). Of primary interest, morph identification was substantially worse for cross-race faces than for own-race faces. Similar to humans, the DCNN performed more accurately for original face images than for morphed image pairs. Notably, the deep network proved substantially more accurate than humans in both cases. The results point to the possibility that DCNNs might be useful for improving face identification accuracy when morphed faces are presented. They also indicate the significance of the ORE in morph attack susceptibility in applied settings.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2022.

Builds on

7 of 40 references.

References · 7

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 621
  3. 2020Demographic Bias in Biometrics: A Survey on an Emerging Challengecited by 93
  4. 2019Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: Where are we on measuring race bias?cited by 56
  5. 2016UMDFaces: An Annotated Face Dataset for Training Deep Networkscited by 42
  6. 2017The Do's and Don'ts for CNN-based Face Verificationcited by 13
  7. 2018Crystal Loss and Quality Pooling for Unconstrained Face Verification and Recognitioncited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.