mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ISTRBoost: Importance Sampling Transfer Regression using Boosting

arXiv 2204.12044 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current Instance Transfer Learning (ITL) methodologies use domain adaptation and sub-space transformation to achieve successful transfer learning. However, these methodologies, in their processes, sometimes overfit on the target dataset or suffer from negative transfer if the test dataset has a high variance. Boosting methodologies have been shown to reduce the risk of overfitting by iteratively re-weighing instances with high-residual. However, this balance is usually achieved with parameter optimization, as well as reducing the skewness in weights produced due to the size of the source dataset. While the former can be achieved, the latter is more challenging and can lead to negative transfer. We introduce a simpler and more robust fix to this problem by building upon the popular boosting ITL regression methodology, two-stage TrAdaBoost.R2. Our methodology,~us, is a boosting and random-forest based ensemble methodology that utilizes importance sampling to reduce the skewness due to the source dataset. We show that~us~performs better than competitive transfer learning methodologies 63% of the time. It also displays consistency in its performance over diverse datasets with varying complexities, as opposed to the sporadic results observed for other transfer learning methodologies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2022.

Builds on

20 of 73 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  3. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
  4. 2018A Survey on Deep Transfer Learningcited by 417
  5. 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 323
  6. 2017Domain Generalization by Marginal Transfer Learningcited by 180
  7. 2018Not-so-supervised: a survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysiscited by 178
  8. 2014Stochastic Optimization with Importance Samplingcited by 91
  9. 2018Importance Weighted Adversarial Nets for Partial Domain Adaptationcited by 90
  10. 2019Learning from Multiple Cities: A Meta-Learning Approach for Spatial-Temporal Predictioncited by 64
  11. 2017Machine Learning for the Geosciences: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 53
  12. 2018Domain Adaptive Transfer Learning with Specialist Modelscited by 31
8 more
  1. 2016Hypothesis Transfer Learning via Transformation Functionscited by 26
  2. 2018Task Transfer by Preference-Based Cost Learningcited by 18
  3. 2016Learning an Invariant Hilbert Space for Domain Adaptationcited by 17
  4. 2017Deep Air Learning: Interpolation, Prediction, and Feature Analysis of Fine-grained Air Qualitycited by 16
  5. 2019Spectral Metric for Dataset Complexity Assessmentcited by 15
  6. 2018Instance-based Deep Transfer Learningcited by 10
  7. 2021Transfer Learning for Linear Regression: a Statistical Test of Gaincited by 10
  8. 2015Gradient Importance Samplingcited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.