mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improve Generalization of Driving Policy at Signalized Intersections with Adversarial Learning

arXiv 2204.04403 ↗First posted 9 Apr 2022cs.RO cs.SY eess.SYcited by 2

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing

Abstract (arXiv)

Intersections are quite challenging among various driving scenes wherein the interaction of signal lights and distinct traffic actors poses great difficulty to learn a wise and robust driving policy. Current research rarely considers the diversity of intersections and stochastic behaviors of traffic participants. For practical applications, the randomness usually leads to some devastating events, which should be the focus of autonomous driving. This paper introduces an adversarial learning paradigm to boost the intelligence and robustness of driving policy for signalized intersections with dense traffic flow. Firstly, we design a static path planner which is capable of generating trackable candidate paths for multiple intersections with diversified topology. Next, a constrained optimal control problem (COCP) is built based on these candidate paths wherein the bounded uncertainty of dynamic models is considered to capture the randomness of driving environment. We propose adversarial policy gradient (APG) to solve the COCP wherein the adversarial policy is introduced to provide disturbances by seeking the most severe uncertainty while the driving policy learns to handle this situation by competition. Finally, a comprehensive system is established to conduct training and testing wherein the perception module is introduced and the human experience is incorporated to solve the yellow light dilemma. Experiments indicate that the trained policy can handle the signal lights flexibly meanwhile realizing the smooth and efficient passing with a humanoid paradigm. Besides, APG enables a large-margin improvement of the resistance to the abnormal behaviors and thus ensures a high safety level for the autonomous vehicle.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 22 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2022.

Builds on

22 of 43 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,143
  4. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
  5. 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
  6. 2020Improved Techniques for Training Single-Image GANscited by 77
  7. 2018An Analysis of Categorical Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
  8. 2019Risk Averse Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 54
  9. 2018A Reinforcement Learning Based Approach for Automated Lane Change Maneuverscited by 44
  10. 2020Safe Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Vehicles through Parallel Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 34
  11. 2021Model-based Constrained Reinforcement Learning using Generalized Control Barrier Functioncited by 30
  12. 2016End-to-End Deep Reinforcement Learning for Lane Keeping Assistcited by 27
10 more
  1. 2021Integrated Decision and Control: Towards Interpretable and Computationally Efficient Driving Intelligencecited by 25
  2. 2017Navigating Occluded Intersections with Autonomous Vehicles using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  3. 2020Numerically Stable Dynamic Bicycle Model for Discrete-time Controlcited by 15
  4. 2019Adaptive dynamic programming for nonaffine nonlinear optimal control problem with state constraintscited by 12
  5. 2020Improving Generalization of Reinforcement Learning with Minimax Distributional Soft Actor-Criticcited by 12
  6. 2020Model-Based Actor-Critic with Chance Constraint for Stochastic Systemcited by 9
  7. 2021Mixed Policy Gradient: off-policy reinforcement learning driven jointly by data and modelcited by 8
  8. 2020Mixed platoon control of automated and human-driven vehicles at a signalized intersection: dynamical analysis and optimal controlcited by 6
  9. 2021Self-learned Intelligence for Integrated Decision and Control of Automated Vehicles at Signalized Intersectionscited by 5
  10. 2021Integrated Decision and Control at Multi-Lane Intersections with Mixed Traffic Flowcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Autonomous Driving at Unsignalized Intersections: A Review of Decision-Making Challenges and Reinforcement Learning-Based Solutions
  2. 2025Robust Planning for Autonomous Driving via Mixed Adversarial Diffusion Predictions
  3. 2021Adversarial Deep Reinforcement Learning for Improving the Robustness of Multi-agent Autonomous Driving Policies
  4. 2025Robust Driving Control for Autonomous Vehicles: An Intelligent General-sum Constrained Adversarial Reinforcement Learning Approach
  5. 2022Cooperative Behavior Planning for Automated Driving using Graph Neural Networks
  6. 2025Robust Planning for Autonomous Vehicles with Diffusion-Based Failure Samplers
  7. 2026VLALight: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Traffic Signal Control
  8. 2022SHAIL: Safety-Aware Hierarchical Adversarial Imitation Learning for Autonomous Driving in Urban Environments