mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Survey on Automated Short Answer Grading with Deep Learning: from Word Embeddings to Transformers

arXiv 2204.03503 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2022cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated short answer grading (ASAG) has gained attention in education as a means to scale educational tasks to the growing number of students. Recent progress in Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning has largely influenced the field of ASAG, of which we survey the recent research advancements. We complement previous surveys by providing a comprehensive analysis of recently published methods that deploy deep learning approaches. In particular, we focus our analysis on the transition from hand engineered features to representation learning approaches, which learn representative features for the task at hand automatically from large corpora of data. We structure our analysis of deep learning methods along three categories: word embeddings, sequential models, and attention-based methods. Deep learning impacted ASAG differently than other fields of NLP, as we noticed that the learned representations alone do not contribute to achieve the best results, but they rather show to work in a complementary way with hand-engineered features. The best performance are indeed achieved by methods that combine the carefully hand-engineered features with the power of the semantic descriptions provided by the latest models, like transformers architectures. We identify challenges and provide an outlook on research direction that can be addressed in the future

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2022.

Builds on

25 of 77 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  5. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  6. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  7. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
  8. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  9. 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
  10. 2017Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Datacited by 432
  11. 2017Recent Trends in Deep Learning Based Natural Language Processingcited by 263
  12. 2016Long Short-Term Memory-Networks for Machine Readingcited by 161
13 more
  1. 2019Semantics-aware BERT for Language Understandingcited by 112
  2. 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
  3. 2019Attention in Natural Language Processingcited by 101
  4. 2020CAT-Gen: Improving Robustness in NLP Models via Controlled Adversarial Text Generationcited by 44
  5. 2019Improving Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks via Knowledge Distillation for Natural Language Understandingcited by 37
  6. 2020Language Model is All You Need: Natural Language Understanding as Question Answeringcited by 29
  7. 2020Get It Scored Using AutoSAS -- An Automated System for Scoring Short Answerscited by 18
  8. 2018Automatic Short Answer Grading and Feedback Using Text Mining Methodscited by 11
  9. 2019Automatic Short Answer Grading via Multiway Attention Networkscited by 8
  10. 2018Evaluating Text GANs as Language Modelscited by 5
  11. 2020Comparative Evaluation of Pretrained Transfer Learning Models on Automatic Short Answer Gradingcited by 5
  12. 2019Joint Multi-Domain Learning for Automatic Short Answer Gradingcited by 4
  13. 2016An Iterative Transfer Learning Based Ensemble Technique for Automatic Short Answer Gradingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 7; 2024: 6; 2025: 1; 2026: 6.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Applying Large Language Models and Chain-of-Thought for Automatic Scoringcited by 69
  2. 2023Towards LLM-based Autograding for Short Textual Answerscited by 20
  3. 2023Performance of the Pre-Trained Large Language Model GPT-4 on Automated Short Answer Gradingcited by 15
  4. 2023Short Answer Grading Using One-shot Prompting and Text Similarity Scoring Modelcited by 7
  5. 2025Disentangling Learning from Judgment: Representation Learning for Open Response Analyticscited by 5
  6. 2023Can LLMs Grade Short-Answer Reading Comprehension Questions : An Empirical Study with a Novel Datasetcited by 4
  7. 2024Autograding Mathematical Induction Proofs with Natural Language Processingcited by 4
  8. 2023Who's the Best Detective? LLMs vs. MLs in Detecting Incoherent Fourth Grade Math Answerscited by 3
  9. 2024Explainable Automatic Grading with Neural Additive Modelscited by 3
  10. 2024The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Educational Measurement: Opportunities and Ethical Challengescited by 3
  11. 2026Confusion-Aware Rubric Optimization for LLM-based Automated Gradingcited by 3
  12. 2024Reducing the Cost: Cross-Prompt Pre-Finetuning for Short Answer Scoringcited by 1
8 more
  1. 2023Using language models in the implicit automated assessment of mathematical short answer itemscited by 0
  2. 2024Auditing an Automatic Grading Model with deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  3. 2024Learning to Love Edge Cases in Formative Math Assessment: Using the AMMORE Dataset and Chain-of-Thought Prompting to Improve Grading Accuracycited by 0
  4. 2026Grading Handwritten Engineering Exams with Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 0
  5. 2026S-GRADES -- Studying Generalization of Student Response Assessments in Diverse Evaluative Settingscited by 0
  6. 2026Confidence Estimation in Automatic Short Answer Grading with LLMscited by 0
  7. 2026Estimating LLM Grading Ability and Response Difficulty in Automatic Short Answer Grading via Item Response Theorycited by 0
  8. 2026Quality-Conditioned Agreement in Automated Short Answer Scoring: Mid-Range Degradation and the Impact of Task-Specific Adaptationcited by 0