Evaluating Text GANs as Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are a promising approach for text generation that, unlike traditional language models (LM), does not suffer from the problem of ``exposure bias''. However, A major hurdle for understanding the potential of GANs for text generation is the lack of a clear evaluation metric. In this work, we propose to approximate the distribution of text generated by a GAN, which permits evaluating them with traditional probability-based LM metrics. We apply our approximation procedure on several GAN-based models and show that they currently perform substantially worse than state-of-the-art LMs. Our evaluation procedure promotes better understanding of the relation between GANs and LMs, and can accelerate progress in GAN-based text generation.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2020: 1; 2021: 2; 2022: 2.
5 papers.
- 2021Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measures: New Developmentscited by 121
- 2020Text Generation by Learning from Demonstrationscited by 64
- 2022Survey on Automated Short Answer Grading with Deep Learning: from Word Embeddings to Transformerscited by 20
- 2021Adversarial Machine Learning in Text Analysis and Generationcited by 2
- 2022Why GANs are overkill for NLPcited by 1
- 2022Why GANs are overkill for NLP19 May 2022
- 2022Survey on Automated Short Answer Grading with Deep Learning: from Word Embeddings to Transformers11 Mar 2022
- 2021Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measures: New Developments17 Mar 2021
- 2021Adversarial Machine Learning in Text Analysis and Generation14 Jan 2021
- 2020Text Generation by Learning from Demonstrations16 Sep 2020