Incremental Prototype Tuning for Class Incremental Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Class incremental learning(CIL) has attracted much attention, but most existing related works focus on fine-tuning the entire representation model, which inevitably results in much catastrophic forgetting. In the contrast, with a semantic-rich pre-trained representation model, parameter-additional-tuning (PAT) only changes very few parameters to learn new visual concepts. Recent studies have proved that PAT-based CIL can naturally avoid fighting against forgetting by replaying or distilling like most of the existing methods. However, we find that PAT-based CIL still faces serious semantic drift, the high-level forgetting problem caused by classifier learning bias at different learning phases, which significantly reduces the performance of PAT-based CIL. To address this problem, we propose Incremental Prototype Tuning (IPT), a simple but effective method that tunes category prototypes for classification and learning example prototypes to compensate for semantic drift. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method can effectively compensate for semantic drift. Combined with well-pre-trained Vit backbones and other PAT methods, IPT surpasses the state-of-the-art baselines on mainstream incremental learning benchmarks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2022.
Builds on
30 of 40 references.
References · 30
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
- 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,332
- 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 938
- 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 882
18 more
- 2019Large Scale Incremental Learningcited by 727
- 2018Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the taskcited by 672
- 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 610
- 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 458
- 2016Expert Gate: Lifelong Learning with a Network of Expertscited by 369
- 2021DER: Dynamically Expandable Representation for Class Incremental Learningcited by 355
- 2021DyTox: Transformers for Continual Learning with DYnamic TOken eXpansioncited by 291
- 2017Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting by Incremental Moment Matchingcited by 243
- 2020Semantic Drift Compensation for Class-Incremental Learningcited by 241
- 2020AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformerscited by 223
- 2020Mnemonics Training: Multi-Class Incremental Learning without Forgettingcited by 220
- 2021Knowledgeable Prompt-tuning: Incorporating Knowledge into Prompt Verbalizer for Text Classificationcited by 183
- 2018Continual Learning of Context-dependent Processing in Neural Networkscited by 178
- 2020Adaptive Aggregation Networks for Class-Incremental Learningcited by 149
- 2019A continual learning survey: Defying forgetting in classification taskscited by 118
- 2020Memory-Efficient Incremental Learning Through Feature Adaptationcited by 107
- 2021Essentials for Class Incremental Learningcited by 57
- 2021Memory-Free Generative Replay For Class-Incremental Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.